Kenuchelover,

It seems you only read my first post because you suggest that I read "The Book of the Hopi" by Frank Waters. See my post to Marduk, September 8, and to Stephanie, September 10. I'm tired of explaining my views as most everybody does not read what I say, and twists my words with preconceived notions of probably being a UFO nutcase, and antedeluvian catastrophist per se. We will see if what I wrote in my first post as you say.

It's like the banner I saw the other day: "Going out for Business", and everybody said the store if "going out of Businees."

For anybody who has read my stuff over the years, I can call "Hunterbear" to my help:

"In our Gray Hole, (his house) the ghosts often dance in the junipers and sage, on the game trails, in the tributary canyons with the thick red maples, and on the high windy ridges - and the dance from within the very essence of our own iner being. They do this especially when the bright night moon shines down on the clean white snow that covers the valley and it's surroundings. Then it is as bright as da -- but in an always soft and mysterious and remembering way."

And:

"None of this , good medicine or bad, is hokum -- nor is it psychological suggestion, Boiled down to the very basic essence, this means that certain people can, in thinking good thoughts, make things bloom and alive -- whereas others, via thought, can make things wither and die. The potential for ESP -- TK/PK, telepathy, prerecognition, clairvoyance etc -- may well exist in all humans (and animals as well.) Much "Western" thinking and narrow scientific methodology can frequently suppress (but not kill) this -- but tribal thinking encourages its conscious development and usage. And there are certain people, who for good or for ill, appear to have this much closer to the surface and more readily at hand."

Ring a bell? I said all these things in so many words over the years, but when Hunterbear says it, it has credibility, when I say it, it is new age rubbish. My thanks to Hunterbear for vindicating me, and to borrow his words again, one can "in an at least reasonable discriminating and filtering sense" read my stuff, only, I used Hermes' "co-conspiring in thinking." It would be nice if most everybody didn't start with: I know where she is coming from, know already what she is going to say, not hearing a thing clearly, let alone considering my meaning.

Charlotte