Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 16, 2024, 1:43 pm UTC    
September 30, 2005 02:53PM
You say:

Quote

We will just have to disagree. Miguel Leon Portilla, the top Mexican scholar on the Aztecs, supports my position in his book Broken Spears. My mentor, Charles Dibble, the translator of the Florentine Codex and a pre-eminent Aztec scholar published The Conquest through Spanish eyes Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press (1978){the 41st Annual Frederick William Reynolds Lecture}. As far as I'm concerned, his evidence, consisting of many direct quotes from the Nahuatl text of the Florentine Codex, is clear and convincing. The Mexica (the ones that count) did not try to kill the Spanish before the "Noche Triste incident." The Spanish did fight and slaughter a number of different ethnic groups such as the inhabitants of Cempoala.

I have read the Florentine Codex codex also and in it I read a lot that could be read has thinking the spanish were "gods", and a lot of post conquest rationlization, esspecially the "mind reading" of Montazuma. I frankly find the notion very hard to take. I suppose the Mexica would not have noticed, the spanish break wind, go to the washroom, spit etc., fornicate and engage in all sorts of rather mundane ordinary behavior and most esspecially why wouild a "god" need translators? I suspect the Mexica could observe these things and draw certain conclusions. That some of the Mexica may have thought the spanish were "gods" for a time is a possibility that they all did so is remote. I further allow the possibility that the Spanish were thought to have "supernatural powers", which did not require belief that they were "gods".

Regarding the "Noche Triste", I am a little aghast that you seem to have forgotten the fighting in Tenotichlan that preceeded that night in which Spaniards were killed. I frankly suspect at least some of the Mexica would have known about the horse and human deaths among the spanish when they fought the Talaxans.

Sorry I just can't take the idea that all or most of the Mexica were both unobservent and not particularily bright.

I frankly think the Indians of Mexico were to a large extent taken aback by the arrival of the spanish and didn't know quite what to make of them. But the idea that they universaily took them to be gods in just sere hokum and a particular legend that became very popular in Europe in the 19th century when it became a standard fantasy that the natives (of whatever stripe) would take Europeans for "gods".

Regarding Cempoala I think you mean Cholua.

Pierre

P.S. Montazuma's alleged involvement with a plot to capture / kill cortez and his men in Cholua is rather a problem if you he really took them to be gods.
Subject Author Posted

Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 27, 2005 03:44PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 27, 2005 05:53PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 27, 2005 06:01PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 27, 2005 06:26PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 27, 2005 07:36PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 08:52AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Pete Clarke September 28, 2005 09:06AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 09:21AM

excellant observation

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 09:20AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 10:19AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 10:53AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 11:04AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 11:26AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

bernard September 28, 2005 11:54AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:24PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 12:26PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 12:38PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:41PM

for Anna

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 12:57PM

Re: for Anna

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 01:00PM

Re: for Anna

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 01:05PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 01:13PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Jon K September 29, 2005 11:03AM

for Mr Pyatt

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 11:09AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 29, 2005 11:33AM

correction and ....cough..... mistake LOL

Jon K September 29, 2005 12:30PM

no Windmills in Mexico

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 12:40PM

Re: correction and ....cough..... mistake LOL

Katherine Reece September 29, 2005 12:46PM

citations

Anthony September 29, 2005 01:05PM

Re: citations

Jon K September 29, 2005 01:09PM

Please

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 01:11PM

Re: citations

Katherine Reece September 29, 2005 01:11PM

Re: correction and ....cough..... mistake LOL

Jon K October 01, 2005 12:35PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:12PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 12:16PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 12:39PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:20PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 12:40PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:43PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 01:12PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 05:12PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 05:50PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 06:14PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 06:33PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 06:35PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 06:49PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

bernard September 28, 2005 07:04PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 08:29PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 08:41PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 08:45PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 08:58PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

bernard September 28, 2005 09:08PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 09:20PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 09:22PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 09:39PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 09:51PM

Score card

Hans September 28, 2005 11:18PM

Re: Score card

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 11:24PM

Re: Score card

Hans September 29, 2005 03:19AM

sniff

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 09:22AM

Re: sniff

Hans September 30, 2005 12:45AM

Re: sniff

Warwick L Nixon September 30, 2005 11:09AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Hermione September 29, 2005 03:20AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 09:28AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 09:38AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Stephen Tonkin September 30, 2005 12:23PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Hermione September 29, 2005 06:31AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Pacal September 29, 2005 11:01AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 11:04AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Pacal September 29, 2005 10:34AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Anthony September 29, 2005 10:50AM

Clam's Eye View

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 10:57AM

just a note

Jon K September 29, 2005 12:45PM

Re: just a note

bernard September 29, 2005 01:57PM

Re: just a note

Sam September 29, 2005 02:14PM

Re: just a note

bernard September 29, 2005 02:34PM

Re: just a note

Anthony September 29, 2005 03:56PM

Re: just a note

Pacal September 29, 2005 02:10PM

Re: just a note

bernard September 29, 2005 03:34PM

Re: just a note

Pacal September 30, 2005 02:53PM

Re: just a note

bernard September 30, 2005 03:57PM

Re: just a note

Pacal October 03, 2005 06:09PM

Re: just a note

Jon K October 05, 2005 12:55PM

Re: just a note

Pacal October 05, 2005 04:58PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login