Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 16, 2024, 10:32 am UTC    
September 28, 2005 12:12PM
Marduk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------


> the best source on earth for tin at this time was
> right near lake titicaca
> where tin mines have been found mined out in the
> late neolithic period.
> the sumerians didn't value gold very much as their
> economy was based on silver
> which goes someway to explaining why the locals
> later had gold in abundance


It hardly matter where the *best* source for tin is! And I'm not sure the best source was at Titicaca anyway ... however according to James D. Muhly, 1995, Mining and Metalwork in Ancient Western Asia, in: Jack M. Sasson, ed. 1995, Civilizations of the Ancient Near East, Vol. III, New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, pp. 1501-1521) Afganistan and Central Asia had plenty enough tin for Sumeria.


>
> And really
> come on now
> the depiction of the sumerian tree of life is
> clearly a coca bush


I don't see how you can say it is CLEARLY anything! Why on earth would he only bring back a coca bush? Where are the potatos? The tomatos? The peanuts? The beans? The corn cobs in the archaeological record? The peppers? The squash? The gourds? South America was filled to the brim with new and fantastic foods ... when the Spanish came there and began exporting food products out they exploded in every market area they touched and raced around the globe.


>
> the fact that the gilgamesh story describes south
> america so well as being across a vast sea debunks
> totally the idea that the cedar forest is in the
> lebanon as orthodoxy suggests
> theres plenty of cedar forests in peru


From what I've read the Gilgamesh story could be describing any number of places!

> another reoccuring theme in sumerian texts is the
> mountain range where both lapis lazuli silver and
> cornelian are found in abundance.

Also Afganistan ... there are mountain there you know


> the Sumerians called the mountain where
> Upnapishtims temple was located red snake
> mountain
> when the area around titcaca is literally crawling
> with red tailed boa

Afganistan alone has over 270 varieties of snakes (52 of them poisonous) are you sure there are no red ones? Just a few seconds of searching turned up the Red Sand Boa ...


> large red snake very noteworthy
> and the dragon boats of titicaca are identical to
> those used by the sumerian civilisation
> in both their construction and their outward
> design


If you live near the water and have reeds how else do you tie them up to make boats? I'm sure anyone with half a brain would have noticed that reeds float.



> The fact that the sumerians settled in areas of
> marshland where they could find supplies of both
> reeds for boat building and clay for temple
> building is lost on most as insignificant


Rivers and marshlands are settled first almost everywhere throughout the world for many various reasons....



Kat

Ma'at Moderator Pull Hair Out

Founder and Director of The Hall of Ma'at

Contributing author to Archaeological Fantasies:
How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public

"If you panic, you're lost" -- W. T. 'Watertight' Southard
Subject Author Posted

Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 27, 2005 03:44PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 27, 2005 05:53PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 27, 2005 06:01PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 27, 2005 06:26PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 27, 2005 07:36PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 08:52AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Pete Clarke September 28, 2005 09:06AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 09:21AM

excellant observation

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 09:20AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 10:19AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 10:53AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 11:04AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 11:26AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

bernard September 28, 2005 11:54AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:24PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 12:26PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 12:38PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:41PM

for Anna

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 12:57PM

Re: for Anna

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 01:00PM

Re: for Anna

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 01:05PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 01:13PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Jon K September 29, 2005 11:03AM

for Mr Pyatt

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 11:09AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 29, 2005 11:33AM

correction and ....cough..... mistake LOL

Jon K September 29, 2005 12:30PM

no Windmills in Mexico

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 12:40PM

Re: correction and ....cough..... mistake LOL

Katherine Reece September 29, 2005 12:46PM

citations

Anthony September 29, 2005 01:05PM

Re: citations

Jon K September 29, 2005 01:09PM

Please

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 01:11PM

Re: citations

Katherine Reece September 29, 2005 01:11PM

Re: correction and ....cough..... mistake LOL

Jon K October 01, 2005 12:35PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:12PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 28, 2005 12:16PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 12:39PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:20PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 12:40PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 12:43PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 01:12PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 05:12PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 05:50PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 06:14PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 06:33PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 06:35PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 06:49PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

bernard September 28, 2005 07:04PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 08:29PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 08:41PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 08:45PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 08:58PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

bernard September 28, 2005 09:08PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 09:20PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 09:22PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Marduk September 28, 2005 09:39PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 09:51PM

Score card

Hans September 28, 2005 11:18PM

Re: Score card

Katherine Reece September 28, 2005 11:24PM

Re: Score card

Hans September 29, 2005 03:19AM

sniff

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 09:22AM

Re: sniff

Hans September 30, 2005 12:45AM

Re: sniff

Warwick L Nixon September 30, 2005 11:09AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Hermione September 29, 2005 03:20AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 09:28AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 09:38AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Stephen Tonkin September 30, 2005 12:23PM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Hermione September 29, 2005 06:31AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Pacal September 29, 2005 11:01AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 11:04AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Pacal September 29, 2005 10:34AM

Re: Marduk ... re Nasca

Anthony September 29, 2005 10:50AM

Clam's Eye View

Warwick L Nixon September 29, 2005 10:57AM

just a note

Jon K September 29, 2005 12:45PM

Re: just a note

bernard September 29, 2005 01:57PM

Re: just a note

Sam September 29, 2005 02:14PM

Re: just a note

bernard September 29, 2005 02:34PM

Re: just a note

Anthony September 29, 2005 03:56PM

Re: just a note

Pacal September 29, 2005 02:10PM

Re: just a note

bernard September 29, 2005 03:34PM

Re: just a note

Pacal September 30, 2005 02:53PM

Re: just a note

bernard September 30, 2005 03:57PM

Re: just a note

Pacal October 03, 2005 06:09PM

Re: just a note

Jon K October 05, 2005 12:55PM

Re: just a note

Pacal October 05, 2005 04:58PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login