You say:

Quote

remember now that Quetzcoatl is described as being bearded and white skinned in most tribal myths and also as coming from the east on a boat and bringing with him civilisation and why perhaps they aligned their buildings in the same northeasterly direction

ARRGGHHHH!!!! I'm sick to death of hearing about the "white God" mythos. Its a crock. What is of interest is that Europeans has they explored and conquered the world had a tendancy to turn local culture originators into "white Gods", its a interesting example of European myth making.

Besides to refer to Nigel Davies whoose book Voyageurs to the New World, is seminal; he entitled one of his chapters "White Gods with Black Faces", to illustrate the rather obvious fact that the Mexican codexes frequently showed Quetzecoatl with a black face.

As for the winged disk one of the two examples you give (the one with Nascal in the Corner), looks almost exactly like the Winged disk illustrated in Churchill's cult masterpiece of high absurdity The lost Continent of Mu. I'm wondering if its one of the "finds" of Niven's allegedly found near Mexico city and probably forgeries.

You also say:

Quote

how many bodies
and from what period
iirc the normal claims that the populations were in excess of 30,000 people.
and i'm not saying that the sumerians settled the land for centuries
the sumerians texts themselves say less than 180 years
and the fact that this habitation ended in 3421 bce when a huge storm hit the region and washed away all their crops leading to mass starvation and death by drowning in low lying regions would tend to point to the fact that you're unlikely to ever find any bodies with middle eastern features.
If this is too difficult for you guys to get your heads round then i'll save the real evidence for another time

At the begining you seem to be refering to the site of Teotihucan. You are aware that the site became "important" c. 200 B.C.E., which is over 3200 years after your date of the Sumerian's supposed disapearance. Or that most of the majour construction at the site was done between 50 B.C.E. and 200 C.E., (i.e., the Avenue of the dead, Pyramid of the Moon, Sun, the Citadel etc.) THe fact that NO old world remains have so far been found at Teotihucan is of course of interest if you assume old world influence.

The huge storm is highly convient, to "explain away" the abscence of evidence, and isn't amazing that they some how seem to have no influence on the site of Aspero or other sites in Peru, and left no trade goods or garbage?

So we have it seems another "great flood" here to explain lack of evidence. P.S. any evidence for said great flood and just where in south America where they?


All in all a excellent example of hyper-difussionistic "reasoning".

Pierre