Re: But the LARGEST group of any kind in the world

Home

Discussion Forums

Papers

Authors

Web Links

May 17, 2024, 5:39 pm UTC

In: The Hall of Maat > Paper Lens - Popular Media > Topic

Goto: Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In

Ancient History • Ancient Egypt • Laboratory • Humanities • Apocalypse • Paper Lens • Coffee Shop
Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals • Alternative Geometry and Numerology

Warwick L Nixon

November 21, 2005 05:04PM

Registered: 19 years ago
Posts: 14,120

"hierarchical"

" lightly. "

you keep moving the goalposts there buddy

Warwick

" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019

Reply Quote

Subject	Author	Posted
fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 10:52AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Anthony	November 21, 2005 11:06AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 11:20AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Anthony	November 21, 2005 11:32AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	msteurbaut	November 21, 2005 12:58PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	MJ Thomas	November 21, 2005 03:43PM
Wait a minute	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 03:51PM
Re: Wait a minute	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 04:26PM
Re: Wait a minute	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 04:37PM
Re: Wait a minute	MJ Thomas	November 21, 2005 07:03PM
Re: Wait a minute	darkuser	November 22, 2005 07:37AM
Re: Wait a minute	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 10:11AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Stephen Tonkin	November 21, 2005 11:24AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 11:33AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Anthony	November 21, 2005 11:42AM
please be more voluminous with info. in your response	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:01PM
Re: please be more voluminous with info. in your response	Simon	November 21, 2005 12:37PM
Re: please be more voluminous with info. in your response	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:52PM
Re: please be more voluminous with info. in your response	Roxana	November 21, 2005 01:14PM
Re: please be more voluminous with info. in your response	Anthony	November 21, 2005 03:15PM
Re: please be more voluminous with info. in your response	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 03:28PM
umm	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 03:48PM
Re: umm	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 03:54PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	darkuser	November 22, 2005 07:46AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	MJ Thomas	November 21, 2005 03:50PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Katherine Reece	November 21, 2005 11:38AM
stupid is as stupid does	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:03PM
Re: stupid is as stupid does	Simon	November 21, 2005 12:43PM
Re: stupid is as stupid does	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 12:46PM
but you can't force anyone to think like you do	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:55PM
Re: but you can't force anyone to think like you do	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 01:00PM
let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 01:23PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 01:57PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 02:08PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 02:08PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Roxana	November 21, 2005 03:28PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 04:19PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 04:21PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	ROxana	November 21, 2005 05:23PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 05:27PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Roxana	November 21, 2005 06:01PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 06:07PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Roxana	November 21, 2005 06:20PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 06:31PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Roxana	November 21, 2005 06:50PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 07:02PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Roxana	November 21, 2005 07:14PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Simon	November 21, 2005 05:34PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 05:43PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Simon	November 21, 2005 06:18PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 06:28PM
Truth is important, fiction is fine when it acknowledges the fiction.	Simon	November 21, 2005 07:29PM
Re: Truth is important, fiction is fine when it acknowledges the fiction.	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 09:34AM
just a note....	darkuser	November 22, 2005 08:06AM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Roxana	November 21, 2005 03:24PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 03:57PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 03:59PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Roxana	November 21, 2005 05:16PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 05:27PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	Simon	November 21, 2005 05:04PM
Re: let's say that these "new agers" actually believe	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 09:07AM
Re: stupid is as stupid does	MJ Thomas	November 21, 2005 03:55PM
Re: stupid is as stupid does	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 04:01PM
Re: stupid is as stupid does	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 04:29PM
Re: stupid is as stupid does	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 04:40PM
Re: stupid is as stupid does	MJ Thomas	November 22, 2005 06:57AM
Re: stupid is as stupid does	Roxana	November 21, 2005 12:49PM
but it's FICTION	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:56PM
Re: but it's FICTION	Roxana	November 21, 2005 01:03PM
IF the Vatican opened their complete documents	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 01:15PM
Re: IF the Vatican opened their complete documents	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 02:00PM
Re: IF the Vatican opened their complete documents	Roxana	November 21, 2005 03:21PM
better than that	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 03:54PM
Re: better than that	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 03:58PM
Re: better than that	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 04:02PM
Re: better than that	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 04:25PM
Re: better than that	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 04:48PM
Re: better than that	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 04:58PM
Re: better than that	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 05:25PM
Re: better than that	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 05:37PM
Re: better than that	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 06:04PM
NO strawmen needed.	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 06:10PM
Re: NO strawmen needed.	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 06:23PM
Re: NO strawmen needed.	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 06:35PM
Re: NO strawmen needed.	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 06:45PM
Re: NO strawmen needed.	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 06:50PM
Re: NO strawmen needed.	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 07:10PM
Re: better than that	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 04:22PM
Re: better than that	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 04:36PM
But the LARGEST group of any kind in the world	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 05:01PM
Re: But the LARGEST group of any kind in the world	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 05:04PM
do you deny the past misdeeds of the Catholic church?	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 05:30PM
No	Simon	November 21, 2005 05:42PM
Re: do you deny the past misdeeds of the Catholic church?	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 05:43PM
Re: But the LARGEST group of any kind in the world	Roxana	November 21, 2005 05:28PM
Re: better than that	ROxana	November 21, 2005 05:13PM
Re: but it's FICTION	Anthony	November 21, 2005 03:19PM
Re: but it's FICTION	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 09:36AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Chris Catignani	November 21, 2005 11:44AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Chris Catignani	November 21, 2005 12:10PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	ROxana	November 21, 2005 12:51PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:53PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Roxana	November 21, 2005 12:57PM
is Brown preventing ANYONE from findout out on their own?	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:58PM
Re: is Brown preventing ANYONE from findout out on their own?	Roxana	November 21, 2005 01:05PM
depends	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 01:21PM
one word	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 01:06PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Roxana	November 21, 2005 12:45PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 12:51PM
what's the difference?	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:56PM
Re: what's the difference?	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 01:02PM
people are free to believe what they want	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 01:24PM
Re: people are free to believe what they want	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 01:58PM
Re: people are free to believe what they want	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 02:10PM
yes and no	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:54PM
Re: yes and no	Roxana	November 21, 2005 12:56PM
Why mention Shriners?	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 12:57PM
Re: Why mention Shriners?	Roxana	November 21, 2005 01:01PM
Re: Why mention Shriners?	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 01:03PM
try to keep the strawmen out and keep to the topic	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 01:22PM
do you not understand the word "usually"?	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 01:17PM
Re: yes and no	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 01:01PM
secrecy regarding GROUPS of people (organizations)	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 01:17PM
Re: secrecy regarding GROUPS of people (organizations)	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 02:01PM
Re: yes and no	MJ Thomas	November 22, 2005 07:11AM
Re: yes and no	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 10:04AM
Re: yes and no	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 01:55PM
gee, we KNEW what they were doing	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 02:04PM
I'm gonna pass completely	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 02:07PM
Re: I'm gonna pass completely	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 02:11PM
Re: I'm gonna pass completely	Warwick L Nixon	November 21, 2005 02:20PM
Moderator note	Stephanie	November 21, 2005 06:34PM
THANKS everyone for participating	Jim Lewandowski	November 21, 2005 07:16PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Pete Clarke	November 22, 2005 08:24AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	darkuser	November 22, 2005 09:22AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 09:38AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Pete Clarke	November 22, 2005 09:43AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 09:59AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Pete Clarke	November 22, 2005 10:19AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 10:25AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 10:35AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 10:44AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 11:37AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 11:44AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 12:01PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 12:53PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 12:58PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Stephanie	November 22, 2005 01:08PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 01:11PM
Moderation note	Stephanie	November 22, 2005 01:25PM
Agreed...	Katherine Reece	November 22, 2005 01:29PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 01:08PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 01:15PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 01:24PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 03:07PM
Moderator note	Stephanie	November 22, 2005 03:33PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 23, 2005 09:49AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Stephanie	November 22, 2005 12:57PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 01:05PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Stephanie	November 22, 2005 01:10PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Pete Clarke	November 22, 2005 09:43AM
The Dei today	John Wall	November 22, 2005 08:44AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Roxana Cooper	November 22, 2005 10:42AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 11:58AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	John Wall	November 22, 2005 12:11PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 12:18PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Roxana Cooper	November 22, 2005 10:50AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 11:39AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	John Wall	November 22, 2005 11:44AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Lee	November 22, 2005 12:08PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Pete Clarke	November 23, 2005 03:59AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Lee	November 23, 2005 09:31AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Pete Clarke	November 23, 2005 09:43AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 23, 2005 09:32AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Roxana	November 22, 2005 12:51PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 12:55PM
responsibility	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 01:01PM
Re: responsibility	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 01:08PM
Re: responsibility	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 01:12PM
Re: responsibility	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 01:18PM
Re: responsibility	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 01:28PM
Re: responsibility	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 03:02PM
Re: responsibility	Warwick L Nixon	November 23, 2005 09:53AM
Re: responsibility	JimLewandowski	November 23, 2005 10:13AM
Re: responsibility	Warwick L Nixon	November 23, 2005 10:18AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Roxana	November 22, 2005 12:43PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 12:57PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Simon	November 22, 2005 01:19PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 22, 2005 01:31PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 03:15PM
eureka!!!	Warwick L Nixon	November 23, 2005 09:56AM
Re: eureka!!!	JimLewandowski	November 23, 2005 10:14AM
Re: eureka!!!	Warwick L Nixon	November 23, 2005 10:21AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Roxana	November 22, 2005 03:21PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 04:16PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Stephanie	November 22, 2005 05:31PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 22, 2005 05:53PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	MJ Thomas	November 22, 2005 07:25PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 23, 2005 08:41AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Roxana Cooper	November 22, 2005 09:09PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Pacal	November 22, 2005 08:28PM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 23, 2005 09:00AM
So an author can write anything he wants......	darkuser	November 23, 2005 09:58AM
Re: So an author can write anything he wants......	JimLewandowski	November 23, 2005 10:05AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Lee	November 23, 2005 10:02AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 23, 2005 10:11AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 23, 2005 10:14AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	JimLewandowski	November 23, 2005 10:19AM
Re: fiction vs. non-fiction - DaVinci Code, historical "facts"	Warwick L Nixon	November 23, 2005 10:27AM

Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.