Byrd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cladking Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> > .and did(st) spew out as Shu,
> > Shu, lift N. up on high;
> > Shu will draw him up
> > those who have lifted themselves up like Shu
> are
> > come
> > Waters, which were brought by Shu and lifted up
> by
> > the two sources,
> > Shu, lift N. up to heaven
> > Shu, thou envelope(st) all things within thine
> > arms.
> > Shu stands on thy fetters.
> > the arms of Shu (were) under the sky as he
> lifted
> > her up
> > upon Shu of Nut ( "nut" is the sky)
> > his two thighs belong to Shu and Tefnut;(One
> lifts
> > and sets things down with one's legs/ thighs).
> > Aker stands up for thee; Shu dries (lit.
> something
> > like. "lies down," Wb. V 366) for thee. They
> > tremble who see the inundation (when) it
> tosses;
> > (Shu dries the earth by tossing the
> inundation.)
> > Thou art Shu; thou art height, (Thou art
> "upward"
> > not a void)
> > Shu, lord of the upper mnst (the word here is
> > "trajectory)
> > thou art above thy father Shu
> > Shu lifts me up;
>
> As I keep telling you, your source is not correct.
> The funky little note (WB V 366) tells you which
> coffin it's from.
>
> It was never in a pyramid.
>
> It's not even 4th dynasty or 5th dynasty or 6th
> dynasty. It's put in the agglomerated Pyramid
> Texts because they used it to flesh out some of
> the meaning of the earlier texts. We can tell
> from spelling errors that they didn't quite
> understand everything they were copying.
>
> Researchers must use ACCURATE SOURCES.

Well of course

However: Not always, if your intend is to have no actual interest in what was written by the AE and just want to make up stuff, then any old 'stuff' is good enough.