The original test:

[www.maatforum.com]

The original claim

[www.maatforum.com]

"Everything we say has a different meaning to every single listener. AL had a single meaning and everyone who understood science as well as the speaker or better got the exact same meaning. "

100% one meaning

So Cladking do AL words have only one meaning? You've claimed it multiple times - do you hold to that designation for the Shu Tests?

Conclusion:

29 nope (no agreement), 6 maybe and 5 yes, 40 shu's replaced by 'upwards' so a range of correctness from 12.5 to 27.5% depending on where ones goes with the five maybes.

Clearly a direct substitution of Upwards for Shu as suggested by Cladking simply doesn't work.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/24/2022 06:57PM by Hans_lune.