Hermione Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> OK.
>
> Can you provide one or two examples of these
> hieroglyphs that you understand, but Egyptologist
> don't?
>
> (If you could provide links, or if you subscribe
> to image hosting, that would be very helpful.

There are several.

For example the glyphs F46 to F50 represent links of a chain with the latter being the connecting piece. What we call the "cartouche" is a sign that represents tying stones to a load. The w3s-sceptre is a device to control the "djed" that made osiris stable in four dimensions. The ankh is a literal depiction of atum/ osiris with the horizontal piece representing the horizon which was also called "heaven" and exists as the Giza Plateau. The tie of isis was a device to connect the "boat of Isis" to the "Bull of Heaven". The "star" in the circle represents the d3.t (duat) but the star is "i3t.wt.t" (young thing) which we call CO2 and they called the origin of the "imperishable stars". The sun rising over the mountains really is the sun rising over the pyramids which were just as much a part of the earth as any mountain. P8 might represent a shm-sceptre rather than an oar. The "flag" is of course identifying the associated representation as a "law" of nature.

There are several others that become apparent when interpreted in this way. Obviously there are other possible causes of all associations than that my interpretations are correct. But because the interpretation explains so much physical evidence and makes predictions I believe that there is a substantial probability that I am essentially correct. I have never actually studied the glyphs for the simple reason that for the main part existing translations are adequate to solve the meaning. Champollion and Egyptologists already did the heavy lifting to solve the Pyramid Texts. I simply look at the glyphs only when the translations contradict my interpretation and then make a note of discrepancies. I have no reason to believe that most of the glyphs are not well understood by Egyptology. While much of the work has been to make sense of the older writing in terms of later writing the simple fact is they are seeking consistencies just as I am. These consistencies tend to usually make them right or at least right in a left handed sort of way.

Many are correct but are misinterpreted. The scarab beetle is a beetle but it represents long life.


These things are hard to see because of the fact later authors misinterpreted the meaning and didn't understand that Ancient words were fixed and the language was metaphysical. Since it was based in a forgotten science and they had no science to solve it they often mistook the meaning. The formatting of the language used by the authors of the "book of the dead" is the same as what we use. Many of the premises that resulted in the "book of the dead" are shared by almost everyone today. The pyramid builders simply didn't think like anyone alive today. They didn't really experience "thought" at all and merely acted on what they knew and understood. While their science was primitive and weak even by our standards it served to make them very powerful. In tandem with their ability to work as one and perfectly in tune with all of nature it made almost anything possible for them.

It is very difficult for us to even conceptualize most of these ideas. We have no experience with a metaphysical or unparseable language and no concept of what it means to live a life without experiencing thought. Of course nobody expected any of the ancient writing to make sense by the time the Pyramid Texts were found so it was easily mistaken for a book of incantation despite the fact its authors neither thought nor believed anything at all.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/23/2022 12:53PM by cladking.