Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 5, 2024, 10:16 pm UTC    
October 17, 2007 10:00AM
The more I think about it, the more the shape of the blocks themselves comes into play.

These blocks all had rounded corners. They were, apparently, intentionally rounded.

Imagine the the size and weight of these monstrosities, barreling down the passages. The rounded edges would make sure (especially along the front four edges) that they would be past anything before they could catch on it. The fact that the lowest block had a significantly smaller leading edge, would make it work as a "plow" of sorts.

As gravity pulled these blocks down the passage, if there were any side walls that were too narrow, they would be 'thrust' back, out of the way, by the force of the wedge-shaped block at the lead. The only places this would not happen would be in the girdle stones, where the entire shape of the passage is "carved out" of two blocks stacked one atop the other, as a canal of sorts. Any other blocks, however, that were too narrow, could easily have been shoved back into the core masonry (and there are some pretty large gaps in this masonry to absorb such a shifting).

Also, we are looking at these passages after millenia of settling and seismic activity. These narrow spots (or short spots) may simply be the result of blocks shifting in to the empty passage. Nature abhors a vacuum.

Just more thoughts on the subject.

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.
Subject Author Posted

AP plugs - food for thought

MJ Thomas October 14, 2007 02:09PM

You've completely ignored the answer

Anthony October 14, 2007 03:49PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought

MJ Thomas October 14, 2007 05:50PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought

MJ Thomas October 14, 2007 06:09PM

The evidence

Anthony October 14, 2007 07:15PM

Re: The evidence

MJ Thomas October 15, 2007 02:18AM

Re: The evidence

Jammer October 17, 2007 11:25AM

Re: The evidence

MJ Thomas October 17, 2007 11:54AM

Here's a thought

Anthony October 18, 2007 07:04PM

Re: Here's a thought

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 04:19AM

Re: Here's a thought

Anthony October 19, 2007 08:46AM

Re: Here's a thought

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 01:58PM

Re: Here's a thought

Anthony October 19, 2007 03:03PM

Re: Here's a thought

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 04:41PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought

RLH October 14, 2007 08:48PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought

MJ Thomas October 15, 2007 05:11AM

Where you probably went wrong

Anthony October 15, 2007 11:35AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 15, 2007 03:09PM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

Anthony October 15, 2007 05:09PM

Corrections for my own thoughts

Anthony October 15, 2007 07:22PM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

RLH October 15, 2007 09:04PM

Note ...

Hermione October 16, 2007 04:24AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 04:53AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

Anthony October 16, 2007 06:00AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 08:22AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

Jon_B October 16, 2007 11:20AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 11:48AM

I stand corrected.

Anthony October 16, 2007 04:34PM

Re: I stand corrected.

Jon_B October 16, 2007 04:56PM

Bad measurements

Anthony October 18, 2007 12:06PM

Re: Bad measurements

Jon_B October 18, 2007 02:42PM

Re: Bad measurements

MJ Thomas October 18, 2007 03:01PM

Re: Bad measurements

Jon_B October 18, 2007 03:14PM

Re: Bad measurements

MJ Thomas October 18, 2007 04:20PM

Re: Bad measurements

Jon_B October 19, 2007 11:15AM

that's not Egyptology...

Anthony October 18, 2007 04:17PM

Re: I stand corrected.

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 05:35PM

Re: I stand corrected.

Anthony October 18, 2007 07:02PM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

RLH October 15, 2007 08:52PM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

Anthony October 16, 2007 04:35AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 05:16AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

fmetrol October 16, 2007 06:05AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 08:55AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

Anthony October 16, 2007 06:41AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 08:40AM

Sub-thread closed

Hermione October 16, 2007 09:19AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

lobo-hotei October 16, 2007 04:33PM

Back to the basics

Anthony October 16, 2007 04:45PM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 05:20PM

Re: Back to the basics

Warwick L Nixon October 16, 2007 06:12PM

Re: Back to the basics

lobo-hotei October 16, 2007 06:19PM

Re: Back to the basics

Warwick L Nixon October 16, 2007 06:29PM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 06:20PM

Re: Back to the basics

fmetrol October 16, 2007 06:56PM

Re: Back to the basics

Warwick L Nixon October 16, 2007 07:15PM

Re: Back to the basics

fmetrol October 16, 2007 07:39PM

Re: Back to the basics

lobo-hotei October 16, 2007 06:04PM

The more I think about it...

Anthony October 17, 2007 10:00AM

Re: The more I think about it...

MJ Thomas October 17, 2007 10:39AM

Re: The more I think about it...

cladking October 17, 2007 10:57AM

Re: The more I think about it...

Jammer October 17, 2007 12:28PM

Exactly my point.

Anthony October 18, 2007 12:08PM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 06:10PM

Re: Back to the basics

RLH October 16, 2007 08:36PM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 17, 2007 03:51AM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 17, 2007 09:32AM

Re: Back to the basics

Jammer October 17, 2007 01:18PM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 06:00PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login