Anthony Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Petrie went to Giza to corroborate Smyth, and
> ended up debunking him. Smyth's work was
> horrendously flawed, and it wasn't beyond him to
> fudge his measurements to fit his preconceived
> ideas of what the structural measurements should
> be.

Hello Anthony,

This only goes to confirm that you have yet to do a direct comparison between the measurements published by Smyth and those published by Petrie.
I refute your assertion that Smyth was dishonest.
It would appear that you are doing nothing more than regurgitating fallacies about Smyth that have been doing the rounds for a few decades now.
I suggest you would do better to read biographies on Smyth and Petrie.


You write, 'As for the rest, well... good luck. I think you're wasting your time, but it's your time to waste.'

Okay, I know it's easier to adopt the "Emporer's New Clothes" approach to these things, but, well, time is one thing I have in abundance - unless, of course, I get run over by a bus tomorrow...

MJ