Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 6, 2024, 6:18 am UTC    
October 15, 2007 11:35AM
Let's take this one piece at a time.

The wooden ramp at the base of the Grand Gallery was necessary for your initial conjecture (that the blocks were stored on the floor of the grand gallery), which you then go on to debunk because they wouldn't have fit on the floor of the grand gallery.

The ramp was where they were stored.

[www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

From this photo (courtesy Jon B.), one can see where the ramp's southern end rested on top of a lowered area of the floor of the Grand Gallery, thus giving it extra length and support.

This picture shows the "direct shot" the blocks would have, sliding down their wooden ramp.

[www.egyptarchive.co.uk]


We already discussed, over a year ago, how the block could be inched down the passage, from behind, by alternating wedges into the opposite side in the back from the one that was binding in the front. You agreed you had not thought of this and were convinced it was a practical solution to the matter. No new evidence has been produced since then, ergo nothing has changed. It is still a practical solution to the challenge.

Now, about your tolerances...

Here's what Petrie has to say about it:

Quote

The granite plugs are kept back from slipping down by the narrowing of the lower end of the passage, to which contraction they fit. Thus at the lower, or N. end, the plug is but 38.2 wide in place of 41.6 at the upper end

Clearly the plugs fit into an area 41.6 inches wide, and it took a 38.2 inch wide space to get them to stop.

You're now somehow saying that a space of 3 inches is insufficient?

I think I see where you've gone astray. You make this claim in your first post:

Quote

These granite blocks total just under 15 feet in length (there is a 4” gap between two of them).

The upper end of the uppermost block measures 41.6” in width and 47.3” in perpendicular height.

The lower end of the lowermost block measures 38.2” in width (and therefore tapers in 1.7” from each side) and 47.3” in perpendicular height.

I think you are misreading Petrie's measurements... and I don't think he wrote them well, either, so I don't blame you. The stones aren't 41.6 inches wide... the passage is 41.6 inches wide at the place where the plug stones end. Read it again from my quote above and you'll see how he changes what he's supposedly measuring in mid-sentence.

Here's a picture of that "upper end", by the way. It's frankly amazing that anybody thinks they could get an accurate reading of it under nearly any circumstances, after Mamun hacked the stuffing out of it to get past it.

[www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

So, the blocks fit into the Grand Gallery for storage, and they easily fit into the shaft with over 3 inches to spare on the side. (38.2 inches at the bottom, versus 41.6 at the top). The top never narrows (as it did in the Trial Passages outside - A correction they made???), so that's not a concern.

I fail to see any difficulty here, except in the interpretation of Petrie's grammar... unless, of course, you have a corroborating measurement from another source? M&R, perhaps?







Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.
Subject Author Posted

AP plugs - food for thought

MJ Thomas October 14, 2007 02:09PM

You've completely ignored the answer

Anthony October 14, 2007 03:49PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought

MJ Thomas October 14, 2007 05:50PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought

MJ Thomas October 14, 2007 06:09PM

The evidence

Anthony October 14, 2007 07:15PM

Re: The evidence

MJ Thomas October 15, 2007 02:18AM

Re: The evidence

Jammer October 17, 2007 11:25AM

Re: The evidence

MJ Thomas October 17, 2007 11:54AM

Here's a thought

Anthony October 18, 2007 07:04PM

Re: Here's a thought

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 04:19AM

Re: Here's a thought

Anthony October 19, 2007 08:46AM

Re: Here's a thought

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 01:58PM

Re: Here's a thought

Anthony October 19, 2007 03:03PM

Re: Here's a thought

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 04:41PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought

RLH October 14, 2007 08:48PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought

MJ Thomas October 15, 2007 05:11AM

Where you probably went wrong

Anthony October 15, 2007 11:35AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 15, 2007 03:09PM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

Anthony October 15, 2007 05:09PM

Corrections for my own thoughts

Anthony October 15, 2007 07:22PM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

RLH October 15, 2007 09:04PM

Note ...

Hermione October 16, 2007 04:24AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 04:53AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

Anthony October 16, 2007 06:00AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 08:22AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

Jon_B October 16, 2007 11:20AM

Re: Corrections for my own thoughts

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 11:48AM

I stand corrected.

Anthony October 16, 2007 04:34PM

Re: I stand corrected.

Jon_B October 16, 2007 04:56PM

Bad measurements

Anthony October 18, 2007 12:06PM

Re: Bad measurements

Jon_B October 18, 2007 02:42PM

Re: Bad measurements

MJ Thomas October 18, 2007 03:01PM

Re: Bad measurements

Jon_B October 18, 2007 03:14PM

Re: Bad measurements

MJ Thomas October 18, 2007 04:20PM

Re: Bad measurements

Jon_B October 19, 2007 11:15AM

that's not Egyptology...

Anthony October 18, 2007 04:17PM

Re: I stand corrected.

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 05:35PM

Re: I stand corrected.

Anthony October 18, 2007 07:02PM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

RLH October 15, 2007 08:52PM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

Anthony October 16, 2007 04:35AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 05:16AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

fmetrol October 16, 2007 06:05AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 08:55AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

Anthony October 16, 2007 06:41AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 08:40AM

Sub-thread closed

Hermione October 16, 2007 09:19AM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

lobo-hotei October 16, 2007 04:33PM

Back to the basics

Anthony October 16, 2007 04:45PM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 05:20PM

Re: Back to the basics

Warwick L Nixon October 16, 2007 06:12PM

Re: Back to the basics

lobo-hotei October 16, 2007 06:19PM

Re: Back to the basics

Warwick L Nixon October 16, 2007 06:29PM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 06:20PM

Re: Back to the basics

fmetrol October 16, 2007 06:56PM

Re: Back to the basics

Warwick L Nixon October 16, 2007 07:15PM

Re: Back to the basics

fmetrol October 16, 2007 07:39PM

Re: Back to the basics

lobo-hotei October 16, 2007 06:04PM

The more I think about it...

Anthony October 17, 2007 10:00AM

Re: The more I think about it...

MJ Thomas October 17, 2007 10:39AM

Re: The more I think about it...

cladking October 17, 2007 10:57AM

Re: The more I think about it...

Jammer October 17, 2007 12:28PM

Exactly my point.

Anthony October 18, 2007 12:08PM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 06:10PM

Re: Back to the basics

RLH October 16, 2007 08:36PM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 17, 2007 03:51AM

Re: Back to the basics

MJ Thomas October 17, 2007 09:32AM

Re: Back to the basics

Jammer October 17, 2007 01:18PM

Re: Where you probably went wrong

MJ Thomas October 16, 2007 06:00PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login