Anthony Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lee Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> >
> > The illegitimate tactic here is yours.
>
> Ignoring evidence from the culture being studied
> is now the legitimate tactic? Fascinating.

No, Lee didn't say or imply that.

> > Indeed, some of the
> > arguments against the earlier date (e.g.,
> > Bolshakov) sound like special pleading. I
> (and
> > Ritva) still await a reference to the "the
> full
> > analysis of the " text showing that the
> "cannot
> > have existed prior to" the later date.

(This point was mentioned by Anthony here).

> If
> there
> > is something that truly settles the argument,
> we
> > would be glad to have it. If it's merely
> rehashed
> > Bolshakov, any notion that the dating is
> resolved
> > is an illusion.
>
>
> I've watched the argument get ignored here. I've
> seen people point to the proof and claim it
> doesn't exist. I've watched the specifics that
> demonstrate the younger dating get ignored so the
> older dating could be maintained.
>
> Why bother rehashing? It'll just get ignored
> again as if it never happened.

Could you provide a link to that previous discussion, please?

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at

Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me