MJ Thomas Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wish it were true...then it would fit perfectly
> into the base width of G3 (aprox 4150")."
>
> So please do tell what you are referring to as not
> being true.
As the sentence reads...I wish it were true. I don't know if it is true and neither do you.
> I am not here to do your research for you, Clive.
> Read the Edgar's books and you will find the info
> you require.
I understand...!
> IMO, if a hypothesis is about intentional
> mathematical relationships between two or more
> dimensions, then it is essential that the raw data
> - the actual dimensions - are measured as
> accurately as possible.
They were, but now you believe 2 inches from a total of 4000+ is the determining factor of right from wrong.
Go for it...!
> An actual difference of plus or minus a couple of
> inches could easily grow into a significant error
> in the hypothesis.
It can't grow...it can only shrink. It's the hypotenuse that is being measured...the distance below base is calculated from it.
> I am ignoring it...
I know you are...!
A two inch discrepancy in 4000" is a concern...but one-two inches in 58" is no problem.
Great logic...you have me convinced.
Bet.
Clive
