Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MJ:
>
> The illustration below shows the horizontal
> dimensioning for the King’s Chamber, Antechamber
> and connecting passage with respect to the
> structure’s c-line...not the “Great step”.

I’m more than happy to go along with your “c-line” – for now…


> It contains a large amount of information and
> requires extensive study to realize what is being
> presented.

This may well be so, Clive, but it is for you to explain to me what it is you are presenting.
It is not for me to try and work it out for myself.


> You state that circular measure is not parceled
> into the Kc design.

You have misunderstood my position on this (more likely I have not explained it clearly enough in the past).
I hypothesise that multiplication and division by 3 1/7 was used extensively in the planning of Khufu’s pyramid.
However, I am uncertain as to whether this number was used as its approximation of the ratio of diameter to circumference or was somehow derived from the seked 5½ without conscious reference to the diameter-circle ratio.


> Whatever you believe is your
> option, but the dimensioned circles have a message
> of their own.

And that message is, what?


> You require a calculator to realize what the
> designers accomplished with this simple
> arrangement of two chambers.

No, Clive.
I need you to show me.
It’s your theory – you explain it.


> The three “adjustable” portcullises in the
> Antechamber are symbolic...representing the
> upper, middle and lower points as illustrated by
> the three colored circles inside the Antechamber.


An interesting idea.
Without more to go on, what more can I say?


> The resulting three colored lines are a guide to
> better things.

Oh dear, here we go again.
And what, dear Clive, are these “better things”?

MJ