Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MJ Thomas Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > I really am at a loss to understand why you
> will
> > not show step-by-step how the architect got
> from a
> > blank page to the plans of the King's
> Chamber,
> > Antechamber, and their connecting passages
> with
> > the dimensions you claim were intentional.
> > Could it be that you simply do not know what
> this
> > planning sequence was because what you have
> > created is nothing more than a random
> mishmash of
> > square roots, imaginary lines, triangles and
> > circles that has no sensible sequence?
>
> MJ:
>
> It is a story much more complicated than you can
> imagine.

Nonsense, Clive.

All you have to do is post (for example):
1. Draw a 2 x 1 rectangle for the Chamber floor.
2. Make the height of the Chamber half the diagonal length of the floor
3. Make the doorway width one-tenth of the length of the Chamber floor
etc., etc., etc., until you have the complete plans of the King's Chamber, the Antechamber, and the two connecting passages.
It's that simple.
You see, Clive, all I am doing is asking you to demonstrate what the architect did and how he did it.
I am not asking you why he did it.


> But I will
> repeat...you must know the mathematics of nature's
> ways or you will be lost.

A word normally associated with shoe repairers of bygone days comes to mind, but I'll settle for: The more complex you make it, the less likely it is to have been.


> Remember...the AE knew how to draw a straight
> line, had spare time in the evenings…and…they knew
> how to count...into the thousands and millions!

I'm sure they did, Clive.
Perhaps you'll now explain what this has to do with the price of cocoa...

MJ