cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hans Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Ah but Cladking will simply dismiss this
> because
> > he has already stated that Merer wasn't writing
> in
> > ancient language therefore it is not
> admissible...
>
> No. You are misquoting me again.

nope

What I said was
> it appears Merer probably didn't command AL but
> this is impossible to know because none of the
> writing is necessarily in complete thoughts
> (sentences).

You never said that before you said you couldn't understand it as it wasn't ancient language but then AL doesn't exist

I believe that most communication
> between Ancient Language speakers and pidgin
> language speakers occurred in one, two, or three
> word phrases that had to be interpreted in
> context. This is why his diary is the way it is.
> It describes in a few words that are not sentences
> the activity of a tugboat.

This is all nonsense you are making stuff and pretending it is real - we don't buy it Cladking
>
> > for that and the 'opinion' of an Egyptologist
> to
> > what is written about the akh is simply wrong
> -...
>
> No! Egyptologists are likely right about most
> things that occur after the great pyramid building
> age.

You have stated a number of times that Egyptologists are wholly wrong.


[grahamhancock.com]

""I've said "Egyptology is wholly wrong about absolutely everything" more times than I can count but one person after another seems to be surprised I just said it."

There are 37+ other instances ( on one website - I estimate you've said it several hundred times on multiple websites) so here is a question why should we believe anything you say since you are willing to lie about everything?

> Facts, logic, and empirical evidence are always
> the only relevancies to knowledge and theory.

...but you don't remotely follow those in any aspect. Your methodology is made up of: claims, irrationality, pretending, lying and no data and research