cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Simple logic is sufficient to show you are wrong.
You really shouldn't start out with such comedic lines - you logic? Really? LOL
>
> If the pyramid builders had ever once said any
> great pyramid was intended or used as a tomb
> Egyptology would cite that as proof they were
> tombs.
Merer was a pyramid builder what did he have to say on the subject? Did the PB's ever once state they had no religion? Did the PBs ever once state they spoke the same language as the Sumerians?
>
> The fact is the builders said the pyramid was the
> king and his tomb was in heaven to which he
> ascended on a cloud of incense.
His/her soul went to heaven not his body - you keep forgetting about those mummy things...lol ....boring.
They never once
> said the great pyramids were tombs or any king was
> buried in one.
They already knew that why state it? The pyramids were tombs. They called them tombs. Pretty convincing to me. So where are the bodies then? Oh, wait you made up that they burned them in direct contradiction of the AE religion - oh wait you deny that exists too(yeah simply logic)....by the way what happens when you announce you made predictions then it all blows up when they were WRONG predictions?
There is nothing but weak
> circumstantial evidence that G1 was built,
> intended, or used as a tomb.
The evidence for it being a tomb is far stronger than it is for anything else. Sorry but you lose again. The only - weak - as in nonexistent is your evidence for any aspect of your idea.
>
> The only great pyramid with even weak evidence of
> having been a tomb is Djoser's Pyramid and it was
> begun NOT AS A PYRAMID but as a mastaba which were
> tombs.
Cladking you can believe whatever you want - you can pretend that geysers were spouting all over Giza, you can pretend funiculars ran up hills or floated around drawn by giant Kites, you can make believe they had no religion, you can talk endlessly about your delusions of their having a language only you can understand.
IT IS ALL NONSENSE we don't believe a word of it - neither do you.
Your entire idea simply cannot be evidenced and requires you to make up assumptions, lie constantly, run from questions, and never provide any evidence.
Go look at the Shu experiment again was it 100% successfully as you predicted? NOPE. You are lying to yourself.
Your idea is falsified - stop trying the 'tactic' of repeating the same claims over and over again. It doesn't work.
You're a fraud stop wasting people's time.