>
> I know this sort of thing sounds "sexy", and
> perhaps to you - with your theory - would be
> another pointer to a previous, lost, advanced
> civilisation, but just read what Archae Solenhofen
> wrote in one of the above posts about engineering
> methods. Simply because we don't know how
> something was done doesn't mean it was done by
> some fantastical method.
>


Certainly this is true but there'sa no reason to
simply write it off as unimportant when we have
no idea how it was done. Perhaps there is a lot
in the method that could go to understanding the
people themselves. Perhaps not.

It's not human nature to simply ignore a mystery.



____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.