RLH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lobo wrote:
>
> >It would be 8.909 or 8 + 10/11.
> >
>
> Very good now we are on the same track (except the
> 10/11 is not unit fractions).
And you did not ask for unit fractions.
> So 7 rise by 5.5 run is (Seked 5.5) and 5.5 rise
> by 7 run is (Seked 8 + ½ + 1/3 + 1/22 + 1/33 )
> This does establish the fact that if we are
> talking about Sekeds then there are two different
> Sekeds involved.
No it doesn't.The Seked, to me at least, refers to the rise/run of the pyramid(external) not internal ratios. Of course we can refer to these as sekeds also but it would get confusing as heck when all these internal"sekeds" were being talked about in a discussion.
> >Or it would simply be 11 palms high for every
> 14 palms across.
> >Now where in the GP is that 11/14 or 14/11
> ratio used again?
>
> Well I think the GP side inclination is close to
> Seked 5 ½ but I’m not sure at this time where
> Seked 8 + ½ + 1/3 + 1/22 + 1/33 is used! Maybe you
> can help me out with that one?
You think it is close? You're not sure?
The Seked 8 +.... isn't used on the GP though the ratio of 11/14 is used with the shafts within the pyramid. This would give a 90 degree angle to the outside angle of the pyramid that was made with that Seked 5 + 1/2 you aren't too sure of.
> I don’t remember saying anything about proving Pi
> here but depending on how you look at it 22 units
> in a 28 unit system is 3 + 1/7. Wouldn’t you
> agree?
No. Your 22 units in a 28 units system would get you 11/14 which gets you 5.5/7 which gets you 0.78571428571428571428571428571429 which gets you 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/28.
Not even close to 3 + 1/7.
> >Your astounding 22 "7ths parts" and 28 "7ths
> parts"
> >could just as easily be seen as 5.5 squares of
> 4 and 7
> >squares of 4.
> > Regards,
> >Lobo-hotei
> >lobo
>
> Well yes I think I pointed that out.
Nope. You just mentioned, in passing, that 28 can be divided by 1, 2, 4, 7. Of course I could have missed the post showing a graph of "4ths" overlayed on the pyramid showing the repetitiveness of the 5.5 and 7 values found in the Seked used to make the pyramid.
The thread is titled "
3 + 1/7" right?
> If anything is astounding then it’s that the
> designers could have put the exit points of the KC
> shafts anywhere. I’m just hoping to point out a
> logical reason for why they put them where they
> did.
Yeah they could have put them on a ratio oppposite the Seked used to build the outside of the pyramid so it hit at a 90 degree angle. Hard to understand.
Treat the earth well, It was not given to you by your parents, It was loaned to you by your children.
Native American Proverb