Lobo wrote:
>It would be 8.909 or 8 + 10/11.
>
Very good now we are on the same track (except the 10/11 is not unit fractions).
So 7 rise by 5.5 run is (Seked 5.5) and 5.5 rise by 7 run is (Seked 8 + ½ + 1/3 + 1/22 + 1/33 )
This does establish the fact that if we are talking about Sekeds then there are two different Sekeds involved.
>Or it would simply be 11 palms high for every 14 palms across.
>Now where in the GP is that 11/14 or 14/11 ratio used again?
Well I think the GP side inclination is close to Seked 5 ½ but I’m not sure at this time where Seked 8 + ½ + 1/3 + 1/22 + 1/33 is used! Maybe you can help me out with that one?
>My point was the rectangle you created isn't anything
>astounding considering the seked used and the ratios
>of the divisions of "7ths" isn't proof of Pi(3 + 1/7) being
>ntentionally encoded.
I don’t remember saying anything about proving Pi here but depending on how you look at it 22 units in a 28 unit system is 3 + 1/7. Wouldn’t you agree?
>Your astounding 22 "7ths parts" and 28 "7ths parts"
>could just as easily be seen as 5.5 squares of 4 and 7
>squares of 4.
> Regards,
>Lobo-hotei
>lobo
Well yes I think I pointed that out. Never said it was astounding news it was just something I wanted to share with other sorry you didn’t like it.
If anything is astounding then it’s that the designers could have put the exit points of the KC shafts anywhere. I’m just hoping to point out a logical reason for why they put them where they did.
Regards,
RLH