Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 12:14 pm UTC    
August 09, 2010 10:24PM
Hi RLH,

RLH wrote: but can you expand a little more on the “ zero point energy....” part.

Not at this time, there is enough confusion regarding Keplers conjecture and as you yourself said: Not sure I completely understood all that. While there are hints that coincide with some of Tesla's works within the mathematics of the Ancient Egyptians demonstrating they were at least cognizant of zero point energy there is nothing at this time I am willing to release towards that end. I have found in the past too much information muddles the works. It is first necessary to identify precisely when, how and where Kepler's concepts, principles and elements occur prior to any speculation on the actual basis for their being there beyond plain old coincidence. It has crossed my mind hundreds of times, maybe the Ancient Egyptians had mathematical abilities far beyond what orthodoxy has been willing to recognize.

It could be a coincidence, but in rational numbers the Kepler conjecture (pi/3*sqrt2) times the Royal Egyptian cubit 189/110 equals the rise-run of G1. (14/11) i.e. (20/27 * 189/110 = 14/11) for me that seems like a pretty bold hint. inversely the rise-run of G1 divided by the Royal Egyptian cubit equals the Kepler conjecture.

It could be a coincidence, but the square root of 2 divided by pi/3 multiplied by the run-rise of G1 = 99/70 / 22/21 * 14/11 = 189/110 feet equals the Royal Egyptian cubit, the inverse of Royal Egyptian cubit is the Kepler conjecture divided by the rise-run of G1, (22/7) / (3 * 99/70) = (20/27)…0.740740740…(20/27) / (14/11) = 110/189

From what I have been able to ascertain the square is no different from the circle, they were considered interchangeable as were the sphere and cube. The Royal Egyptian cubit of 20 34/55 inches is the cubit of the sphere. There are other length cubits derived from different shapes. Demonstrated by the Kings Chamber length, 1/22 the base of G1 and 1/7 the length of the sphinx. That is 34 4/11 feet the surface area square footage of a 36" circumference sphere.

But Making a 36" circumference from a 9-inch square:
9 * 9 = 81 area of square perimeter of square 4*9 = 36
81 * 14/11 = 103 1/11 inches area of circle with a 36 inch circumference with a diameter of 11 5/11 inches with a surface area of 412 4/11 inches (20 cubits)

Making a 36" sphere from a 9 inch cube
9 * 9 = 81 area of square
81 * 6 = 486 square inches = surface area of a 9 inch cube
(412 4/11 / 486 = 28/33) is always the ratio between the surface areas of a sphere and cube, i.e. (14^2) * 22/7 = 616…616 / 28/33 = 726…726 / 6 = 121 (11^2)

14/11 * 2/3 = 28/33 equals the ratio between the surface area of a sphere and cube from the AE perspective. Using their system reduced complicated mathematical equations to simple fractional math problems.

Relating to your grid, I find it extremely interesting that the ventilation shafts exit at at the 102 course the exact point of 28/22 grid, (14/11) and drawing a correlation of which there are many, but 28 * 22 equals an area grid with 616 squares same as the surface area of a 14 inch diameter sphere (14^2) * 22/7 = 616…616 / 28/33 = 726…726 / 6 = 121 (11^2) equals an 11 inch cube.

Regards
Subject Author Posted

3+1/7

RLH August 07, 2010 04:02AM

Re: 3+1/7

Warwick L Nixon August 07, 2010 09:46AM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 07, 2010 10:58AM

Artifacts

Anthony August 07, 2010 04:28PM

Re: Artifacts

Khazar-khum August 08, 2010 04:12AM

Re: Artifacts

Don Barone August 08, 2010 09:35AM

Re: Artifacts

Anthony August 08, 2010 09:46AM

Re: Artifacts

Sirfiroth August 08, 2010 10:27AM

Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 08, 2010 10:21AM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Khazar-khum August 08, 2010 03:15PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 08, 2010 05:02PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Hermione August 09, 2010 03:10AM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Katherine Reece August 09, 2010 11:50AM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 09, 2010 01:11PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 09, 2010 01:07PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

RLH August 08, 2010 11:30PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 09, 2010 10:24PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Khazar-khum August 09, 2010 11:36PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

RLH August 10, 2010 05:12AM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Khazar-khum August 10, 2010 03:59PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

RLH August 10, 2010 05:10AM

Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Anthony August 09, 2010 08:25AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Don Barone August 09, 2010 08:38AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Hermione August 09, 2010 09:58AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Don Barone August 09, 2010 10:38AM

Evidence of use - GIGO

Anthony August 09, 2010 10:41AM

Counting the Cubits

Warwick L Nixon August 09, 2010 11:14AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Hermione August 09, 2010 11:50AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Anthony August 09, 2010 02:23PM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Warwick L Nixon August 09, 2010 02:36PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Warwick L Nixon August 09, 2010 10:09AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 08, 2010 11:10PM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 09, 2010 06:44PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 10, 2010 05:20AM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 10, 2010 08:45AM

Re: 3+1/7

Sirfiroth August 10, 2010 08:59AM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 10, 2010 09:15AM

Re: 3+1/7

Sirfiroth August 10, 2010 09:38AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 11, 2010 06:01AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 11, 2010 05:47AM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 12, 2010 10:57AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 14, 2010 02:07PM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 14, 2010 05:17PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 23, 2010 04:35PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 08, 2010 11:06PM

Choosing Variables

Anthony August 09, 2010 08:28AM

Re: Choosing Variables

RLH August 10, 2010 05:23AM

**Moderation note**

Hermione August 10, 2010 05:39AM

Re: Choosing Variables

Anthony August 11, 2010 02:00PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Sirfiroth August 11, 2010 05:25PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Anthony August 11, 2010 06:22PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Warwick L Nixon August 11, 2010 08:16PM

Not Choosing Variables

Sirfiroth August 11, 2010 09:34PM

Re: Choosing Variables

RLH August 11, 2010 09:37PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Sirfiroth August 11, 2010 09:41PM

Re: Choosing Variables

RLH August 11, 2010 09:50PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Anthony August 16, 2010 02:26AM

Re: 3+1/7

Warwick L Nixon August 09, 2010 10:23AM

Re: 3+1/7

cladking August 08, 2010 10:55AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 08, 2010 11:12PM

Re: 3+1/7

northstar2595 August 11, 2010 10:14PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 14, 2010 02:18PM

Re: 3+1/7

Mark Heaton September 15, 2010 05:30PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH September 16, 2010 01:28AM

Re: 3+1/7

Mark Heaton September 16, 2010 02:32AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login