Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 4:34 am UTC    
August 08, 2010 10:21AM
Hey guys, I know you don’t believe the AE were capable of comprehending pi, let alone their ability to comprehend, demonstrate and make use of the Kepler conjecture (densities of cubic and hexagonal packing of spheres) in the construction of G1, now that would really be a stretch wouldn’t it?

But you see the AE did not build (a mountain) the pyramids to encode pi or any other mathematical concept, they, like we, used the concepts to explain universal phenomena! The length of the cubit being 1/20th the surface area of a 36 inch sphere is derived and demonstrated by the Kepler Conjecture pi / (3 Sqrt 2). It is therefore possible to calculate the cubit from the Kepler Conjecture! Calculate the following: pi / (3 sqrt 2) = 0.740480489…. 0.740480489 / (14/11) = .0581806099 the inverse being 1.718785694… 1.718785694 * 12 = 20.62542833 inches which is a acceptable value for the cubit according to Petrie. The Kepler conjecture has the same relation to the Royal Egyptian cubit as the area of a circle has to the area of a square whose circumference and perimeters are equal as demonstrated by G1, 14/11.

Having shown in an earlier post the circular and spherical characteristics demonstrated by G1, Red and Bent pyramids [www.hallofmaat.com] and demonstrating the cubit by concept is: (14/11) (99/70/(22/7/3)) = 189/110 feet, 1.718181818 feet...equal to 1/20th the surface area of a 3-foot circumference sphere. It is all but impossible to accurately translate this into today's mathematical terms. The closest translation to our concepts would be (sqrt(1.618033989) sqrt(2))/(pi/3) which yields a value of 1.717830068...feet, which multiplied by 12 inches = 20.61960816 inches, still within Petrie's limits, but misses the intended meaning.

The above are irrational numbers and we know the Ancient Egyptians did not use irrational numbers. I can spell it out in unit fractions if you wish, but I doubt anyone would be able to wade through calculations in that form and actually comprehend what was written. So expressed in proper and improper fractions the figures as the AE would have calculated in rational form: (22/7) / (3 * 99/70) = (20/27)…0.740740740…(20/27) / (14/11) = 110/189 = the inverse of the Royal Egyptian Cubit which is 189/110…189/110 * 12 = 20 34/55 inches, that is (20.6181818…inches).

In rational numbers the Kepler conjecture times the Royal Egyptian cubit equals the rise-run of G1. (14/11) i.e. (20/27 * 189/110 = 14/11)
So is the Kepler conjecture just another artifact of G1?

The Kepler’s formula for cubic and hexagonal sphere packing (22/7) / (3 * 99/70) divided by (14/11) = 110/189 inverse Royal Egyptian Cubit when combined with J. Michell’s ancient formula for calculating earth dimensions will provide an accurate figure for the polar radius of Earth. 110/189 * 12^7 = 20854491 3/7 feet divided by 5280 is 3949 5/7 miles.

(110/189 * 12 = 6 62/63) (6 62/63 * 12 = 83 17/21) (83 17/21 * 12 = 1005 5/7) (1005 5/7 * 12 = 12068 4/7) (12068 4/7 * 12 = 114822 6/7) (114822 6/7 * 12 = 1737874 2/7) (1737874 2/7 * 12 = 20854491 3/7 feet) = (110/189 * 12 ^ 7 = 20854491 3/7 feet) = Earth’s Polar Radius in feet. Not too bad for a bunch of dumb guy's who lived 4500 years ago and didn't comprehend the concept of pi.

Expressed in today’s math concepts (pi/(3 sqrt(2)))/sqrt(1.618033989) 12^7/5280 = Earth polar radius = 3950.523043 miles. In other words the Kepler conjecture times the square root of phi times J. Michell’s ancient formula for calculating earth dimensions divided by the number of feet in a mile equals the Earth’s polar radius within a mile or two.

I know you won’t believe the AE were capable of comprehending any of the above, so their being able to comprehend and employ zero point energy....






Subject Author Posted

3+1/7

RLH August 07, 2010 04:02AM

Re: 3+1/7

Warwick L Nixon August 07, 2010 09:46AM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 07, 2010 10:58AM

Artifacts

Anthony August 07, 2010 04:28PM

Re: Artifacts

Khazar-khum August 08, 2010 04:12AM

Re: Artifacts

Don Barone August 08, 2010 09:35AM

Re: Artifacts

Anthony August 08, 2010 09:46AM

Re: Artifacts

Sirfiroth August 08, 2010 10:27AM

Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 08, 2010 10:21AM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Khazar-khum August 08, 2010 03:15PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 08, 2010 05:02PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Hermione August 09, 2010 03:10AM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Katherine Reece August 09, 2010 11:50AM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 09, 2010 01:11PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 09, 2010 01:07PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

RLH August 08, 2010 11:30PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Sirfiroth August 09, 2010 10:24PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Khazar-khum August 09, 2010 11:36PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

RLH August 10, 2010 05:12AM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Khazar-khum August 10, 2010 03:59PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

RLH August 10, 2010 05:10AM

Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Anthony August 09, 2010 08:25AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Don Barone August 09, 2010 08:38AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Hermione August 09, 2010 09:58AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Don Barone August 09, 2010 10:38AM

Evidence of use - GIGO

Anthony August 09, 2010 10:41AM

Counting the Cubits

Warwick L Nixon August 09, 2010 11:14AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Hermione August 09, 2010 11:50AM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Anthony August 09, 2010 02:23PM

Re: Offensive Strawmen and Ridiculously Obvious Ethnocentric Projections

Warwick L Nixon August 09, 2010 02:36PM

Re: Artifacts and then there are Artifacts!

Warwick L Nixon August 09, 2010 10:09AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 08, 2010 11:10PM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 09, 2010 06:44PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 10, 2010 05:20AM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 10, 2010 08:45AM

Re: 3+1/7

Sirfiroth August 10, 2010 08:59AM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 10, 2010 09:15AM

Re: 3+1/7

Sirfiroth August 10, 2010 09:38AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 11, 2010 06:01AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 11, 2010 05:47AM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 12, 2010 10:57AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 14, 2010 02:07PM

Re: 3+1/7

lobo-hotei August 14, 2010 05:17PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 23, 2010 04:35PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 08, 2010 11:06PM

Choosing Variables

Anthony August 09, 2010 08:28AM

Re: Choosing Variables

RLH August 10, 2010 05:23AM

**Moderation note**

Hermione August 10, 2010 05:39AM

Re: Choosing Variables

Anthony August 11, 2010 02:00PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Sirfiroth August 11, 2010 05:25PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Anthony August 11, 2010 06:22PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Warwick L Nixon August 11, 2010 08:16PM

Not Choosing Variables

Sirfiroth August 11, 2010 09:34PM

Re: Choosing Variables

RLH August 11, 2010 09:37PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Sirfiroth August 11, 2010 09:41PM

Re: Choosing Variables

RLH August 11, 2010 09:50PM

Re: Choosing Variables

Anthony August 16, 2010 02:26AM

Re: 3+1/7

Warwick L Nixon August 09, 2010 10:23AM

Re: 3+1/7

cladking August 08, 2010 10:55AM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 08, 2010 11:12PM

Re: 3+1/7

northstar2595 August 11, 2010 10:14PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH August 14, 2010 02:18PM

Re: 3+1/7

Mark Heaton September 15, 2010 05:30PM

Re: 3+1/7

RLH September 16, 2010 01:28AM

Re: 3+1/7

Mark Heaton September 16, 2010 02:32AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login