Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 12, 2024, 9:01 am UTC    
January 12, 2008 09:09PM
Byrd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> How many texts have you read other than the PTs
> (which were written over several hundred years and
> may have some cultural changes in them) and do you
> actually read hieroglyphics or are you starting to
> learn to read them? How much do you know about
> their daily lives and social structure? How much
> do you know about their medicine and how it was
> practiced?
>
I haven't gotten more than a smattering of the heiroglyps yet. Most of this has just been absorbed rather than studied. Internet Explore 7 is going to change the way these appear in English so I'll probably wait until I need a new computer if I study them.

I know a little phsyiology and know something of the way things work. I've seen no original references to medicine before the 5th dynasty. Later stuff has little interest to me.


> Trying to make theories about a culture based only
> on a few references and one book is rather like
> trying to understand the British Empire based on
> the reading of William Blake's poems.

> The PTs are local in time and space and do not
> encompass the beliefs of the whole Egyptian empire
> for the whole 3,000 years it existed. Again, it's
> like trying to understand the Roman Empire and
> theorizing about Caligula by only looking at Rome
> during the period of the Samnite Wars (several
> hundred years before Caligula's time.)
>
> People do lots of things for gods they don't
> invoke, including building thousands of massive
> gothic catheddrals and putting millions of works
> of art in them and maintaining them even when the
> people are poor, starving, and suffering.
>

This is exactly what I've been trying to say for months now; almost everything we know about the Great Pyramid builders and their beliefs is based on a very few number of sources. The Pyramid Texts are central to this understanding. If there are fundamental errors in our understanding of this then there will be fundamental errors in our understanding of the ancients. The Pyramid Texts have to be dissected carefully because they are obviously written over a long period of time, but far more important are the actual meanings and translations. What was true at one time might have been much less true at another and what is translated incorrectly can rend the meaning far asunder.

By "invoke" I mean call on them for any purpose. This would include building temples and praying as well as making sacrifices or relating to Them in Their capacity as a creator or devine power. Yes, I remember that it was established earlier in this thread that there were cults which worshipped individual kings long after the 4th dynasty. But this appears to be a specific worship by a specific group rather than a general worship by at least a small percentage of believers.


____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Subject Author Posted

Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 12:10PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 12:20PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 12:27PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 12:33PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 12:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 01:11PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:54PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 02:01PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 02:14PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 03:15PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 04:50PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 02, 2008 11:19PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 11:42PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 03, 2008 01:40AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 03, 2008 02:22PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 03, 2008 11:14PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 12:45AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 04, 2008 01:19AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 04, 2008 05:16AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 03:43PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 03:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 04, 2008 04:17PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 09, 2008 12:26PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 04, 2008 05:47AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 04, 2008 11:49AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 06, 2008 05:27AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 07, 2008 12:59AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 09, 2008 11:18AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 02, 2008 12:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:05PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Kanga January 02, 2008 07:36PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Dave L January 02, 2008 12:50PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 01:01PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:02PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 01:14PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 02, 2008 01:49PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 02:05PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 02, 2008 04:50PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 05:00PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 02, 2008 08:20PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 09:03PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 03, 2008 12:11PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 03, 2008 02:26PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 03, 2008 06:55PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 04, 2008 02:24PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 03:30PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 05, 2008 04:51PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 03, 2008 05:05PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 04, 2008 10:22AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Pistol January 02, 2008 05:27PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Kanga January 02, 2008 08:55PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Kanga January 02, 2008 07:40PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 09, 2008 10:30PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 10, 2008 12:44AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 11, 2008 10:19AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 12, 2008 07:15PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 12, 2008 09:09PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 09:36PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 13, 2008 02:55PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 04:02PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 04:27PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 04:41PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 04:54PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 05:52PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 06:21PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 15, 2008 10:16AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 15, 2008 02:46PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 15, 2008 04:49PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 13, 2008 04:41PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 05:54PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 15, 2008 09:01AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 15, 2008 02:58PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login