Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 11, 2024, 6:30 am UTC    
January 04, 2008 05:16AM
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Palace of Versailles?
>
> It looks very impressive on Wikipedia. They
> suggest that it probably required 6 to 25% of
> French income to build but this is no doubt
> referencing government income. The Great Pyramid
> being built with primitive technology using
> commonly accepted means might cost close to 25% of
> GNP!!! Large numbers of men would have been
> called upon to actually contribute effort to it.

Actually, more recent estimates considerd that at most perhaps 15,000 people (men, as well as children and women, who provided the food for the male workers) worked in the Great Pyramid construction (and this was not year-round as I recall). You should look into Lehner's book on the Complete Pyramids for more on this. As such, I doubt that 25% of the GNP was directed to its completion.

> Of course much of the work would have been
> essentially "wasted" since the workers had no
> pressing business otherwise during the busy season
> for building.

Essentially, work on the pyramids has been considered in the past as examples of corvée labour [an obligation imposed on inhabitants of a district to perform services, for little or no remuneration by a feudal lord].

Yet, Lehner's archaeological work shows that the workers were well-cared for, paid in bread, beer, vegetables, and meats, which would have been welcomed since much of their work was performed during the Inundation periods, when food was not available and most of the residents of Egypt would have relied upon stored food in the government granaries.

So, workers were compensated and it appears, from Lehner's work, very well compensated - firstly in in their food selection (which was far more that the traditionally thought pay of "bread and onions"). They were also provided a city of sorts in which to live during their work sessions (also found by Lehner's excavations), and in which their familes joined them.

Perhaps a bit like the Civilian Conservation Corps of the Great Depression, where people (primarily single males) were moved to sections of the country for government-related construction projects, and the Works Project Administration of the New Deal era of US history which provided needed local and national construction projects, the work provided by the Great Pyramids construction may have provided essential work which equaled food, clothing and housing for those normally agrarian populace displaced by annual flooding.

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg

Doctoral Candidate
Oriental Institute
Doctoral Programme in Oriental Studies [Egyptology]
Oxford University
Oxford, United Kingdom

Subject Author Posted

Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 12:10PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 12:20PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 12:27PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 12:33PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 12:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 01:11PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:54PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 02:01PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 02:14PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 03:15PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 04:50PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 02, 2008 11:19PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 11:42PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 03, 2008 01:40AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 03, 2008 02:22PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 03, 2008 11:14PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 12:45AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 04, 2008 01:19AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 04, 2008 05:16AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 03:43PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 03:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 04, 2008 04:17PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 09, 2008 12:26PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 04, 2008 05:47AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 04, 2008 11:49AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 06, 2008 05:27AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 07, 2008 12:59AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 09, 2008 11:18AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 02, 2008 12:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:05PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Kanga January 02, 2008 07:36PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Dave L January 02, 2008 12:50PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 01:01PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:02PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 01:14PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 02, 2008 01:49PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 02:05PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 02, 2008 04:50PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 05:00PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 02, 2008 08:20PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 09:03PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 03, 2008 12:11PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 03, 2008 02:26PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 03, 2008 06:55PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 04, 2008 02:24PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 03:30PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 05, 2008 04:51PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 03, 2008 05:05PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 04, 2008 10:22AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Pistol January 02, 2008 05:27PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Kanga January 02, 2008 08:55PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Kanga January 02, 2008 07:40PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 09, 2008 10:30PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 10, 2008 12:44AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 11, 2008 10:19AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 12, 2008 07:15PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 12, 2008 09:09PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 09:36PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 13, 2008 02:55PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 04:02PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 04:27PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 04:41PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 04:54PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 05:52PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 06:21PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 15, 2008 10:16AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 15, 2008 02:46PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 15, 2008 04:49PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 13, 2008 04:41PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 05:54PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 15, 2008 09:01AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 15, 2008 02:58PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login