Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 11, 2024, 7:08 pm UTC    
January 04, 2008 01:19AM
The Palace of Versailles?

It looks very impressive on Wikipedia. They suggest that it probably required 6 to 25% of French income to build but this is no doubt referencing government income. The Great Pyramid being built with primitive technology using commonly accepted means might cost close to 25% of GNP!!! Large numbers of men would have been called upon to actually contribute effort to it.

Of course much of the work would have been essentially "wasted" since the workers had no pressing business otherwise during the busy season for building.

The Hoover dam and most modern works are capital projects designed for functional purposes and to return a profit to bond holders and other stakeholders. Indeed, many of the ancient massive projects were apparently intended to serve important functions and pay dividends to the builders. Often these were for military purposes.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/04/2008 01:24AM by cladking.
Subject Author Posted

Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 12:10PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 12:20PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 12:27PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 12:33PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 12:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 01:11PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:54PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 02:01PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 02:14PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 03:15PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 04:50PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 02, 2008 11:19PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 11:42PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 03, 2008 01:40AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 03, 2008 02:22PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 03, 2008 11:14PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 12:45AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 04, 2008 01:19AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 04, 2008 05:16AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 03:43PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 03:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 04, 2008 04:17PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 09, 2008 12:26PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 04, 2008 05:47AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 04, 2008 11:49AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 06, 2008 05:27AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 07, 2008 12:59AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 09, 2008 11:18AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 02, 2008 12:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:05PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Kanga January 02, 2008 07:36PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Dave L January 02, 2008 12:50PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 01:01PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:02PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 01:14PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 02, 2008 01:49PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 01:57PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 02, 2008 02:05PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 02, 2008 04:50PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 05:00PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 02, 2008 08:20PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 02, 2008 09:03PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 03, 2008 12:11PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 03, 2008 02:26PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 03, 2008 06:55PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 04, 2008 02:24PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Khazar-khum January 04, 2008 03:30PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 05, 2008 04:51PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 03, 2008 05:05PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 04, 2008 10:22AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Pistol January 02, 2008 05:27PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Kanga January 02, 2008 08:55PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Kanga January 02, 2008 07:40PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 09, 2008 10:30PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 10, 2008 12:44AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 11, 2008 10:19AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 12, 2008 07:15PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 12, 2008 09:09PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 12, 2008 09:36PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg January 13, 2008 02:55PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 04:02PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 04:27PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 04:41PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 04:54PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 05:52PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Warwick L Nixon January 13, 2008 06:21PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 15, 2008 10:16AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 15, 2008 02:46PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 15, 2008 04:49PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Byrd January 13, 2008 04:41PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 13, 2008 05:54PM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

Jammer January 15, 2008 09:01AM

Re: Why no ascended kings?

cladking January 15, 2008 02:58PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login