Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 22, 2024, 11:20 am UTC    
October 01, 2001 10:24AM
<HTML>Well I insist that the scale be 1:1 - better force those pyramids light years apart!

-----------
I assume you are joking. :-)
-----------

The main problem I have though is that the axis has to be changed to accomodate the fit that you (and Rcool smiley are making.

-----------
Avry Wilson has proposed an explanaition for this which does not rely upon a model of the precessional cycle "dialed back" to 10,500 BCE. Perhaps you can have a look at his paper which is published at his Web site (I am unsure of the link).

I admit however that this *is* a real puzzel - but i would not consider it an objection - not in the light of the statistical evidence we will provide for the distance and angular match.

Personally, I have no idea why the AEs would replicate the Orion's Belt geometrical pattern and then tilt it at an aproximate 45 degree angle.

However, this is only a "problem" (if that!) if we assume that the structures in question "represent" stars. We cannot draw that conclusion on the basis of the angle and distance evidence! All we can prove is that the structures are arranged in a pattern that is an intentional paralel of the Orion Belt pattern.

FOR EXAMPLE: The grooved Greek Pillar has been suggested by some to have been inspired by the trunk of a certain tree. Assuming this is true, we cannot assume that everywhere we see the Greek Pillar, the artist was "representing" this tree symbolicaly. At some point, the representative significance was lost at what remained was a standard rendering pattern.

So too, it may well be that the Belt Star geometry passed into AE culture as an artistic asthetic and emerged in the Giza ground plan - without the architects even being aware of its significance.

I personally feel this scenario unlikely. I mention it only by way of establishing that intentional Orion Symbolism in the Pyramids or any other GIza structure requires Archeological "cultural" evidence to establish.

But the intentional engineering of the correlation itself, can now safely be established on the basis of the angle and distance measures alone (once we make our results public).

ISHMAEL</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

For Duncan RE Coincidence

sandy September 29, 2001 06:21PM

Re: Sorry

sandy September 29, 2001 06:41PM

Re: Sorry

Anthony September 30, 2001 05:51AM

Re: Sorry

Stephen Tonkin September 30, 2001 07:30AM

Re: Sorry

Anthony September 30, 2001 07:50AM

Re: Sorry

Stephen Tonkin September 30, 2001 11:05AM

Re: Sorry

sandy September 30, 2001 08:19AM

Re: Sorry

Stephen Tonkin September 30, 2001 11:07AM

Technically possible...

Anthony September 30, 2001 05:12PM

Re: Technically possible...

Greg Reeder September 30, 2001 06:00PM

Yep.... see this

Katherine Reece September 30, 2001 07:55PM

Re: Technically possible...

Brad September 30, 2001 09:11PM

Re: Technically possible...

Stephen Tonkin September 30, 2001 11:30PM

Two answers....

Anthony October 01, 2001 04:25PM

Long accurate alignments and TRASH

Stephen Tonkin October 02, 2001 05:10AM

TRASH is RIGHT!

Anthony October 02, 2001 10:32AM

Re: TRASH is trash!

Stephen Tonkin October 02, 2001 06:59PM

Re: TRASH is trash!

Anthony October 03, 2001 07:07AM

Re: TRASH is trash!

Stephen Tonkin October 03, 2001 11:20AM

Re: Sorry

John September 30, 2001 06:12AM

Re: Sorry

Anthony September 30, 2001 06:45AM

A Hint

ISHMAEL September 30, 2001 01:26PM

Re: A Hint

John September 30, 2001 02:00PM

No, he won't elaborate...

Anthony September 30, 2001 05:16PM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 04:19AM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

ISHMAEL October 01, 2001 06:57AM

Statistical Analysis and probability

Claire October 01, 2001 07:20AM

Re: Statistical Analysis and probability

ISHMAEL October 01, 2001 09:10AM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 07:22AM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

ISHMAEL October 01, 2001 09:21AM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 09:40AM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

ISHMAEL October 01, 2001 10:24AM

Rotating the Axis

Anthony October 01, 2001 10:26AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 11:50AM

Call me stupid...

Anthony October 01, 2001 12:47PM

Re: Call me stupid...

Claire October 01, 2001 01:16PM

Re: Call me stupid...

ISHMAEL October 01, 2001 01:49PM

Re: Call me stupid...

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 03:55PM

Re: Call me stupid...

ISHMAEL October 02, 2001 09:10AM

Re: Call me stupid...

Anonymous User October 02, 2001 10:29AM

Re: Call me stupid...

ISHMAEL October 02, 2001 12:56PM

ISHMAEL!!!!!!

Anthony October 02, 2001 01:45PM

Re: ISHMAEL!!!!!!

ISHMAEL October 02, 2001 02:19PM

Re: ISHMAEL!!!!!!

Anthony October 02, 2001 02:21PM

Re: Call me stupid...

Anonymous User October 02, 2001 01:54PM

Re: Call me stupid...

ISHMAEL October 02, 2001 02:28PM

Re: Call me stupid...

Anonymous User October 03, 2001 08:29AM

Re: Call me stupid...

Stephen Tonkin October 03, 2001 11:06AM

Re: Call me stupid...

ISHMAEL October 03, 2001 11:12AM

Re: Call me stupid...

Claire October 02, 2001 03:27PM

Re: Call me stupid...

Anonymous User October 03, 2001 08:18AM

Don't Call the AE's Stupid :-)

ISHMAEL October 03, 2001 11:17AM

Re: Call me stupid...

Anthony October 01, 2001 01:51PM

Re: Call me stupid...

Claire October 01, 2001 01:59PM

Call you Smart!

Anthony October 01, 2001 02:15PM

Anthony

Claire October 01, 2001 02:19PM

Re: Anthony

Anthony October 01, 2001 02:25PM

Re: Anthony

Claire October 01, 2001 02:27PM

Re: Call me stupid...

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 03:42PM

Yo, Duncan!

Anthony October 02, 2001 01:50PM

Re: Yo, Duncan!

Anonymous User October 02, 2001 02:28PM

East is east and West is west.

ISHMAEL October 02, 2001 02:45PM

Guys...

Anthony October 02, 2001 03:19PM

Re: Guys...

Anonymous User October 02, 2001 03:34PM

Okay...Uh....no.

Anthony October 02, 2001 04:55PM

Re: Okay...Uh....no.

Anonymous User October 03, 2001 08:49AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

ISHMAEL October 01, 2001 01:30PM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 04:10PM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Stephen Tonkin October 02, 2001 01:51AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Claire October 02, 2001 05:03AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Stephen Tonkin October 02, 2001 06:08AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Anonymous User October 02, 2001 06:19AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Stephen Tonkin October 02, 2001 09:14AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Anonymous User October 02, 2001 03:03PM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Dave Moore October 05, 2001 03:17AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Stephen Tonkin October 05, 2001 05:50AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Dave Moore October 05, 2001 09:08AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

Stephen Tonkin October 05, 2001 11:39AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

ISHMAEL October 02, 2001 09:14AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

sandy October 02, 2001 09:51AM

Re: Rotating the Axis

ISHMAEL October 02, 2001 01:05PM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

Stephen Tonkin October 01, 2001 01:40PM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

ISHMAEL October 01, 2001 01:50PM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

ISHMAEL October 01, 2001 10:08AM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 11:21AM

Re: No, he won't elaborate...

Stephen Tonkin October 01, 2001 01:42PM

Re: Sorry

John September 30, 2001 06:57AM

Re: Sorry

Anthony September 30, 2001 07:52AM

Re: Sorry

Katherine Reece September 30, 2001 08:12AM

Re: For Duncan RE Coincidence

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 04:44AM

Re: For Duncan RE Coincidence

Stephen Tonkin October 01, 2001 05:20AM

Re: For Duncan RE Coincidence

Anonymous User October 01, 2001 07:08AM

Re: For Duncan RE Coincidence

Stephen Tonkin October 01, 2001 01:47PM

Re: For Duncan RE Coincidence

sandy October 01, 2001 05:25AM

Re: For Duncan RE Coincidence

ISHMAEL October 01, 2001 07:05AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login