<HTML>My concern is that if we overlay the beltstars over the entire site, it'll only be a matter of time before three "THINGS" match up absolutely perfectly.
--------------------
Of course.
But if there is consistency between the objects aligned, you have a true statistical relationship (that does *not* mean of course that you don't have a coincidence).
For example, the imfamous Horizon program where buildings of various types from New York City were aligned with a constellation. This *alignment* had no internal consistency. This was not a true statistical relationship as absolutely any building could have been selected, so long as it fell beneath a star point. The large number of possible buildings from which to choose also made the odds of achieving the alignment aproximately 100%.
--------------------
There had better be REAL good reasons behind choosing the points that align with the beltstars of Orion. Otherwise, it is SIMPLY a coincidence... no matter HOW exact it is.
---------------------
That isn't quite true.
There is a threshold beyond which a pheneomena has become so unlikely to have arrisen by chance that it is determined "statistically proven." No supporting qualitative evidence is required because that evidence does not add substantial weight to the overwhelming statistical (and quantifiable) evidence.
As mentioned above, there must be some relationship between the "targets" which renders the correlation internally consistent, and to establish statistical 'proof," the number of available targets must be small.
There are three targets. They are all exactly the same. They are unlike any other objects on the plataue. They align with Orion's belt with a margin of error far less than 1%. Far far less.
(These objects bear a proximal relationship with the Pyramids and it is this relationship that produces the apparent alignment of the pyramids with the belt-stars).
I am confident that a statistical analysis of the phenomena we have encountered will conclude that the relationship is unlikely to have emerged by chance. But we shall see.
ISHMAEL</HTML>