Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Home

Discussion Forums

Papers

Authors

Web Links

May 6, 2024, 1:50 pm UTC

In: The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Topic

Goto: Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In

Ancient History • Ancient Egypt • Laboratory • Humanities • Apocalypse • Paper Lens • Coffee Shop
Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals • Alternative Geometry and Numerology

Anthony

August 14, 2001 02:26PM

<HTML>As I said, Occam's Razor is a convention... not a proof.

Thanks for the insight. I have to agree with scientific theory being a means of eliminating theories... not proving them.

Fascinating in its potentials. It (theoretically) means that NOTHING is true... only "not yet proven false".

Would you agree with that?

Anthony</HTML>

Reply Quote

Subject	Author	Posted
Repeatability in archaeology	Martin Stower	August 14, 2001 06:47AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Anthony	August 14, 2001 08:09AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Mikey Brass	August 14, 2001 08:36AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Anthony	August 14, 2001 09:02AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	John Wall	August 14, 2001 09:12AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Mikey Brass	August 14, 2001 09:14AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Anthony	August 14, 2001 10:07AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Stephen Tonkin	August 14, 2001 10:41AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Anthony	August 14, 2001 02:26PM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Mikey Brass	August 14, 2001 08:34AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Anthony	August 14, 2001 09:07AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Mikey Brass	August 14, 2001 09:25AM
Re: Repeatability in archaeology	Anthony	August 14, 2001 02:29PM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login