Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 6, 2024, 12:17 pm UTC    
August 14, 2001 09:02AM
<HTML>Dating an object is not an experiment in archaeology, however.

In the case of c-14, it is a chemistry experiment.

In the case of stratigraphy, it is logical assumption... but not proof. People can bury things and throw off stratigraphy.

Nothing about assembling a logical sequence is repeatable. Except to look at the data again and again and keep coming up with the same assumptions.

Agreed?

Anthony</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Repeatability in archaeology

Martin Stower August 14, 2001 06:47AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Anthony August 14, 2001 08:09AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Mikey Brass August 14, 2001 08:36AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Anthony August 14, 2001 09:02AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

John Wall August 14, 2001 09:12AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Mikey Brass August 14, 2001 09:14AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Anthony August 14, 2001 10:07AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Stephen Tonkin August 14, 2001 10:41AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Anthony August 14, 2001 02:26PM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Mikey Brass August 14, 2001 08:34AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Anthony August 14, 2001 09:07AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Mikey Brass August 14, 2001 09:25AM

Re: Repeatability in archaeology

Anthony August 14, 2001 02:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login