Re: are you sure??

Home

Discussion Forums

Papers

Authors

Web Links

May 19, 2024, 11:21 am UTC

In: The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Topic

Goto: Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In

Ancient History • Ancient Egypt • Laboratory • Humanities • Apocalypse • Paper Lens • Coffee Shop
Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals • Alternative Geometry and Numerology

Roxana

January 24, 2006 12:43PM

Forgive me. I am a poor, ignorant literalist incapable of seeing esoteric symbolism everywhere. A terrible weakness I agree. Of course I'm not arguing the Red Sea actually parted, and Angel's didn't win the Battle of Mons either.

Reply Quote

Subject	Author	Posted
King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Andrew Earl Singer	January 23, 2006 08:25AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	John Wall	January 23, 2006 08:28AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Ritva Kurittu	January 23, 2006 08:35AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Amanda R	January 23, 2006 10:05AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Ritva Kurittu	January 23, 2006 10:27AM
like searching for ...	Warwick L Nixon	January 23, 2006 10:43AM
Re: like searching for ...	Ritva Kurittu	January 23, 2006 11:06AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Gerd VDC	January 23, 2006 10:39AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Andrew Earl Singer	January 23, 2006 07:44PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Gerd VDC	January 24, 2006 03:00AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Andrew Earl Singer	January 24, 2006 08:17AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Pete Clarke	January 24, 2006 08:39AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Gerd VDC	January 24, 2006 09:38AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Anthony	January 24, 2006 11:46AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Anthony	January 24, 2006 08:54AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Anthony	January 23, 2006 11:48AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Greg Reeder	January 23, 2006 11:12AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Ritva Kurittu	January 23, 2006 11:31AM
virtually all biblical characters	JimLewandowski	January 23, 2006 11:52AM
Re: virtually all biblical characters	Roxana	January 23, 2006 12:32PM
it's LOGICAL	JimLewandowski	January 23, 2006 12:55PM
Re: it's LOGICAL	Roxana	January 23, 2006 01:50PM
Re: it's LOGICAL	JimLewandowski	January 23, 2006 02:53PM
Re: it's LOGICAL	Roxana	January 23, 2006 03:36PM
are you sure??	JimLewandowski	January 23, 2006 03:49PM
Re: are you sure??	Damian Walter	January 23, 2006 04:34PM
Re: are you sure??	JimLewandowski	January 23, 2006 04:39PM
Re: are you sure??	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 04:49AM
Re: are you sure??	Roxana	January 24, 2006 12:43PM
Re: are you sure??	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 02:46PM
Waters are PRIMARY to the creation event	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 02:51PM
further	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 02:57PM
Re: are you sure??	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 03:19PM
Re: are you sure??	Warwick L Nixon	January 24, 2006 12:51PM
Re: are you sure??	Lee	January 24, 2006 01:28PM
Re: are you sure??	Warwick L Nixon	January 24, 2006 01:43PM
Re: are you sure??	Lee	January 24, 2006 02:13PM
Re: are you sure??	Roxana	January 24, 2006 03:27PM
Re: are you sure??	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 03:39PM
Re: are you sure??	Lee	January 25, 2006 10:56AM
Re: are you sure??	Roxana	January 25, 2006 03:13PM
no implying of any kind	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 02:36PM
Re: no implying of any kind	Warwick L Nixon	January 24, 2006 02:49PM
Re: no implying of any kind	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 02:54PM
Re: no implying of any kind	Warwick L Nixon	January 24, 2006 03:03PM
Re: it's LOGICAL	Damian Walter	January 23, 2006 01:54PM
Re: it's LOGICAL	JimLewandowski	January 23, 2006 03:04PM
Re: it's LOGICAL	Damian Walter	January 23, 2006 04:19PM
Re: it's LOGICAL	JimLewandowski	January 23, 2006 04:31PM
Re: it's LOGICAL	Roxana	January 23, 2006 03:32PM
Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings	JimLewandowski	January 23, 2006 03:50PM
Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings	Damian Walter	January 23, 2006 04:24PM
Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings	JimLewandowski	January 23, 2006 04:35PM
Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings	Roxana	January 24, 2006 12:46PM
Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings	Warwick L Nixon	January 24, 2006 12:52PM
Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings	Roxana	January 24, 2006 03:48PM
We're dealing with probabilities, not possibilities	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 02:49PM
Re: We're dealing with probabilities, not possibilities	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 03:26PM
I have no opinion nor interest in what you've posted	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 03:44PM
LOL! n/t	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 03:49PM
Your point doesn't address the original subject	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 03:58PM
What can I say?	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 04:04PM
example biblical text	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 04:14PM
Question on this biblical text	Anthony	January 24, 2006 04:17PM
It doesn't matter	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 06:19PM
Re: It doesn't matter	Anthony	January 24, 2006 09:34PM
Re: It doesn't matter	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 11:00PM
Re: It doesn't matter	Roxana Cooper	January 25, 2006 10:57AM
Re: It doesn't matter	Warwick L Nixon	January 25, 2006 11:12AM
you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 11:21AM
Re: you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God	Warwick L Nixon	January 25, 2006 11:35AM
Re: you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God	Roxana	January 25, 2006 12:43PM
Re: you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God	John Wall	January 25, 2006 01:12PM
From experience, using the term exploded planet	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 03:22PM
Re: you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God	Tommi Huhtamaki	January 25, 2006 01:15PM
Pffffft....	Anthony	January 25, 2006 01:24PM
Re: Pffffft....	Tommi Huhtamaki	January 25, 2006 01:34PM
Jerry Goldsmith	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 01:54PM
Re: Question on this biblical text	Lee	January 26, 2006 02:59PM
Re: I have no opinion nor interest in what you've posted	Roxana	January 24, 2006 03:50PM
the facts are the least important elements of the book	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 12:18AM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	lobo-hotei	January 25, 2006 12:52AM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 01:17AM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	lobo-hotei	January 25, 2006 01:55AM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	Roxana Cooper	January 25, 2006 11:11AM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 11:27AM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	Warwick L Nixon	January 25, 2006 11:32AM
and I've been 100% honest about that	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 01:28PM
Re: and I've been 100% honest about that	Warwick L Nixon	January 25, 2006 01:40PM
I have no interest in fiction	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 01:56PM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	lobo-hotei	January 25, 2006 11:49AM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	Roxana	January 25, 2006 12:50PM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	lobo-hotei	January 25, 2006 01:02PM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	Roxana	January 25, 2006 03:21PM
I'm so bad at directions I have to orient the map	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 03:32PM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 01:33PM
Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book	Roxana	January 25, 2006 12:47PM
You're getting closer	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 03:31PM
Re: virtually all biblical characters	Pacal	January 24, 2006 05:54PM
defining creation story	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 08:24PM
Re: defining creation story	Pacal	January 25, 2006 04:12PM
Re: defining creation story	JimLewandowski	January 25, 2006 04:26PM
Re: defining creation story	Pacal	January 26, 2006 07:42PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Roxana	January 23, 2006 12:28PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Andrew Earl Singer	January 23, 2006 03:56PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	John Wall	January 23, 2006 04:13PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Ritva Kurittu	January 23, 2006 04:17PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Rick B	January 23, 2006 11:12PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Marduk	January 24, 2006 12:41AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 08:11AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Marduk	January 24, 2006 08:35AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	John Wall	January 24, 2006 08:37AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Marduk	January 24, 2006 10:23AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	John Wall	January 24, 2006 12:18PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Marduk	January 24, 2006 12:34PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 09:32AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Marduk	January 24, 2006 09:44AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 10:05AM
Moderator Note	Katherine Reece	January 24, 2006 11:35AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Marduk	January 24, 2006 12:37PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 12:42PM
touche'	Warwick L Nixon	January 24, 2006 12:45PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Marduk	January 24, 2006 12:53PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Warwick L Nixon	January 24, 2006 12:57PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Marduk	January 24, 2006 01:03PM
Mod note~~	lobo-hotei	January 24, 2006 01:11PM
Re: Mod note~~	Marduk	January 24, 2006 01:31PM
Correct. Literalism seems to have paid virtually NO	JimLewandowski	January 24, 2006 10:06AM
Re: Correct. Literalism seems to have paid virtually NO	Pacal	January 29, 2006 06:53PM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Hermione	January 24, 2006 11:44AM
Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses	Damian Walter	January 24, 2006 12:44PM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login