Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 19, 2024, 10:14 am UTC    
January 24, 2006 12:34PM
Whale Thames dead
zzzzzzzzzzzz

They say the sea is cold, but the sea contains
the hottest blood of all, and the wildest, the most urgent.

All the whales in the wider deeps, hot are they, as they urge
on and on, and dive beneath the icebergs.
The right whales, the sperm-whales, the hammer-heads, the killers
there they blow, there they blow, hot wild white breath out of
the sea!

And they rock, and they rock, through the sensual ageless ages
on the depths of the seven seas,
and through the salt they reel with drunk delight
and in the tropics tremble they with love
and roll with massive, strong desire, like gods.
Then the great bull lies up against his bride
in the blue deep bed of the sea,
as mountain pressing on mountain, in the zest of life:
and out of the inward roaring of the inner red ocean of whale-blood
the long tip reaches strong, intense, like the maelstrom-tip, and
comes to rest
in the clasp and the soft, wild clutch of a she-whale's
fathomless body.

And over the bridge of the whale's strong phallus, linking the
wonder of whales
the burning archangels under the sea keep passing, back and
forth,
keep passing, archangels of bliss
from him to her, from her to him, great Cherubim
that wait on whales in mid-ocean, suspended in the waves of the
sea
great heaven of whales in the waters, old hierarchies.

And enormous mother whales lie dreaming suckling their whale-
tender young
and dreaming with strange whale eyes wide open in the waters of
the beginning and the end.

And bull-whales gather their women and whale-calves in a ring
when danger threatens, on the surface of the ceaseless flood
and range themselves like great fierce Seraphim facing the threat
encircling their huddled monsters of love.
And all this happens in the sea, in the salt
where God is also love, but without words:
and Aphrodite is the wife of whales
most happy, happy she!

and Venus among the fishes skips and is a she-dolphin
she is the gay, delighted porpoise sporting with love and the sea
she is the female tunny-fish, round and happy among the males
and dense with happy blood, dark rainbow bliss in the sea.

smiling smiley
Subject Author Posted

King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Andrew Earl Singer January 23, 2006 08:25AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

John Wall January 23, 2006 08:28AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Ritva Kurittu January 23, 2006 08:35AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Amanda R January 23, 2006 10:05AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Ritva Kurittu January 23, 2006 10:27AM

like searching for ...

Warwick L Nixon January 23, 2006 10:43AM

Re: like searching for ...

Ritva Kurittu January 23, 2006 11:06AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Gerd VDC January 23, 2006 10:39AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Andrew Earl Singer January 23, 2006 07:44PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Gerd VDC January 24, 2006 03:00AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Andrew Earl Singer January 24, 2006 08:17AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Pete Clarke January 24, 2006 08:39AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Gerd VDC January 24, 2006 09:38AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Anthony January 24, 2006 11:46AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Anthony January 24, 2006 08:54AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Anthony January 23, 2006 11:48AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Greg Reeder January 23, 2006 11:12AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Ritva Kurittu January 23, 2006 11:31AM

virtually all biblical characters

JimLewandowski January 23, 2006 11:52AM

Re: virtually all biblical characters

Roxana January 23, 2006 12:32PM

it's LOGICAL

JimLewandowski January 23, 2006 12:55PM

Re: it's LOGICAL

Roxana January 23, 2006 01:50PM

Re: it's LOGICAL

JimLewandowski January 23, 2006 02:53PM

Re: it's LOGICAL

Roxana January 23, 2006 03:36PM

are you sure??

JimLewandowski January 23, 2006 03:49PM

Re: are you sure??

Damian Walter January 23, 2006 04:34PM

Re: are you sure??

JimLewandowski January 23, 2006 04:39PM

Re: are you sure??

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 04:49AM

Re: are you sure??

Roxana January 24, 2006 12:43PM

Re: are you sure??

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 02:46PM

Waters are PRIMARY to the creation event

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 02:51PM

further

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 02:57PM

Re: are you sure??

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 03:19PM

Re: are you sure??

Warwick L Nixon January 24, 2006 12:51PM

Re: are you sure??

Lee January 24, 2006 01:28PM

Re: are you sure??

Warwick L Nixon January 24, 2006 01:43PM

Re: are you sure??

Lee January 24, 2006 02:13PM

Re: are you sure??

Roxana January 24, 2006 03:27PM

Re: are you sure??

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 03:39PM

Re: are you sure??

Lee January 25, 2006 10:56AM

Re: are you sure??

Roxana January 25, 2006 03:13PM

no implying of any kind

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 02:36PM

Re: no implying of any kind

Warwick L Nixon January 24, 2006 02:49PM

Re: no implying of any kind

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 02:54PM

Re: no implying of any kind

Warwick L Nixon January 24, 2006 03:03PM

Re: it's LOGICAL

Damian Walter January 23, 2006 01:54PM

Re: it's LOGICAL

JimLewandowski January 23, 2006 03:04PM

Re: it's LOGICAL

Damian Walter January 23, 2006 04:19PM

Re: it's LOGICAL

JimLewandowski January 23, 2006 04:31PM

Re: it's LOGICAL

Roxana January 23, 2006 03:32PM

Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings

JimLewandowski January 23, 2006 03:50PM

Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings

Damian Walter January 23, 2006 04:24PM

Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings

JimLewandowski January 23, 2006 04:35PM

Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings

Roxana January 24, 2006 12:46PM

Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings

Warwick L Nixon January 24, 2006 12:52PM

Re: Remember, the REASON for religion/religious writings

Roxana January 24, 2006 03:48PM

We're dealing with probabilities, not possibilities

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 02:49PM

Re: We're dealing with probabilities, not possibilities

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 03:26PM

I have no opinion nor interest in what you've posted

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 03:44PM

LOL! n/t

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 03:49PM

Your point doesn't address the original subject

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 03:58PM

What can I say?

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 04:04PM

example biblical text

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 04:14PM

Question on this biblical text

Anthony January 24, 2006 04:17PM

It doesn't matter

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 06:19PM

Re: It doesn't matter

Anthony January 24, 2006 09:34PM

Re: It doesn't matter

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 11:00PM

Re: It doesn't matter

Roxana Cooper January 25, 2006 10:57AM

Re: It doesn't matter

Warwick L Nixon January 25, 2006 11:12AM

you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 11:21AM

Re: you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God

Warwick L Nixon January 25, 2006 11:35AM

Re: you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God

Roxana January 25, 2006 12:43PM

Re: you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God

John Wall January 25, 2006 01:12PM

From experience, using the term exploded planet

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 03:22PM

Re: you still seem to be evading the issue of the identity of God

Tommi Huhtamaki January 25, 2006 01:15PM

Pffffft....

Anthony January 25, 2006 01:24PM

Re: Pffffft....

Tommi Huhtamaki January 25, 2006 01:34PM

Jerry Goldsmith

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 01:54PM

Re: Question on this biblical text

Lee January 26, 2006 02:59PM

Re: I have no opinion nor interest in what you've posted

Roxana January 24, 2006 03:50PM

the facts are the least important elements of the book

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 12:18AM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

lobo-hotei January 25, 2006 12:52AM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 01:17AM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

lobo-hotei January 25, 2006 01:55AM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

Roxana Cooper January 25, 2006 11:11AM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 11:27AM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

Warwick L Nixon January 25, 2006 11:32AM

and I've been 100% honest about that

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 01:28PM

Re: and I've been 100% honest about that

Warwick L Nixon January 25, 2006 01:40PM

I have no interest in fiction

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 01:56PM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

lobo-hotei January 25, 2006 11:49AM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

Roxana January 25, 2006 12:50PM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

lobo-hotei January 25, 2006 01:02PM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

Roxana January 25, 2006 03:21PM

I'm so bad at directions I have to orient the map

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 03:32PM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 01:33PM

Re: the facts are the least important elements of the book

Roxana January 25, 2006 12:47PM

You're getting closer

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 03:31PM

Re: virtually all biblical characters

Pacal January 24, 2006 05:54PM

defining creation story

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 08:24PM

Re: defining creation story

Pacal January 25, 2006 04:12PM

Re: defining creation story

JimLewandowski January 25, 2006 04:26PM

Re: defining creation story

Pacal January 26, 2006 07:42PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Roxana January 23, 2006 12:28PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Andrew Earl Singer January 23, 2006 03:56PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

John Wall January 23, 2006 04:13PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Ritva Kurittu January 23, 2006 04:17PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Rick B January 23, 2006 11:12PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Marduk January 24, 2006 12:41AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 08:11AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Marduk January 24, 2006 08:35AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

John Wall January 24, 2006 08:37AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Marduk January 24, 2006 10:23AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

John Wall January 24, 2006 12:18PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Marduk January 24, 2006 12:34PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 09:32AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Marduk January 24, 2006 09:44AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 10:05AM

Moderator Note

Katherine Reece January 24, 2006 11:35AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Marduk January 24, 2006 12:37PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 12:42PM

touche'

Warwick L Nixon January 24, 2006 12:45PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Marduk January 24, 2006 12:53PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Warwick L Nixon January 24, 2006 12:57PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Marduk January 24, 2006 01:03PM

Mod note~~

lobo-hotei January 24, 2006 01:11PM

Re: Mod note~~

Marduk January 24, 2006 01:31PM

Correct. Literalism seems to have paid virtually NO

JimLewandowski January 24, 2006 10:06AM

Re: Correct. Literalism seems to have paid virtually NO

Pacal January 29, 2006 06:53PM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Hermione January 24, 2006 11:44AM

Re: King Tutankhamen, Queen Ankhesenamen and Moses

Damian Walter January 24, 2006 12:44PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login