waggy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for pointing out my typo of 77.4, you are
> correct it is given by M&R as 74.4, l will
> edit my paper in due course.(and think of getting
> bi-focals, maybe its time)
I don't have presbyopia but I don't always use my glasses as I should. I always upload pdfs to my Kindle since I don't like reading from the screen. I am a bit busy and have not found the time to look at the article in greater detail. I will surely be taking a better look since I want to add a chapter regarding Shepsekaf to my Sneferu book that I am working on. I have completed a book that presents the basic correlations of the Egyptian pyramids to Hellenic mountains theory(in English this time).
> The 18.4m is Perrings height value of approx 60ft
> 3 inches
Based on what I have checked numerologically(that is based on my theory that relates to Hellenic mountains etc), the 18.4 m value looks good.
> M&R provide two corridor lengths along E&W
> walls of 10.65W, 10.62E
I have reasons to believe that the length ratios of internal chambers or corridors might want to tell us something.
> 1.14m is incorrect, M&R give culmative
> measures, so for example in fig 4, they give the
> entrance starting at 33 from east wall and then
> 114 to west side of passage, looking at the
> drawing you would think the passage was 114 wide,
> but you have to subtract the 33 to give 81cm,
> which is confirmed by scale rule.
I am not sure that this width was planned to encode something although I do have some numerological ideas about it. Thanks.
>
> A considerable amount of granite dressing is
> required and needs to be taken into account along
> with possible flooring, so have not concentrated
> on dimensions too much, as dressing will lengthen
> some and shorten others. A more forensic analysis
> of the masonry bonds, survey etc is required to
> try and recover the designers intent.
I believe the given external dimensions are accurate. I have devised a plan to explain what they were thinking of. I agree with those who prompt you to put all your work in book form. For this book to be useful to pyramid enthusiasts I think it will need detail internal and external dimensions along with diagrams. I also believe that o presentation of the names of the pharaohs with their hieroglyphs is important. Finally, another thing that is of importance is the exact position of a structure. Its geographical coordinates as also the distance and direction in regards to neighboring structures is important. Ad to that it's position in regards to structures close chronologically.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/14/2018 12:36PM by Spiros.