It 
> is the duty of Egyptology to thoroughly explore 
> structures under its control; 

No its the duty of those who are interested in a particular point of interest - measurements in this case - to gather money and obtain permission to do it. You'll note a lack of interest in Egyptology to do so?

Hi Hans,

My reply in the thread was not specific to just measurements, there is much in the pyramid that remains to be recorded and analysed and it IS their duty to thoroughly explore the structure. Egyptology has given a narrative of the structure based on opinion and not scientific analysis, how can Egyptology give an opinion when they have not even explored it; if you feel Egyptology have given the structure a thorough exploration, well that is fine, its certainly a view l do not hold. Its not just about measures, any detailed exploration would provide an accurate survey as part of its investigation in any event.

'Very good keep trying. You need to get an accredited organization behind you'

Would that accredited organization be an Egyptology one? In effect l highlight some issues and go to an Egyptologist, l suggest a theory that runs counter to their own accepted narrative, and surprise l get no response, l am just the latest in a long line of pyramidiots. Do you not think that l have approached Egyptologists?

Egyptology does indeed hold the keys, certainly they will give you the keys if you agree with their position. If Egyptology maintain that there is a 60 degree pyramid and settlement issues, then l would ask that they prove it by scientific methods and not opinion; but it appears l have to do all the thorough exploration, without the benefit of the keys.

It is Egyptologys duty to thoroughly explore the structure, the exploration of it is derisory and amounts to a dereliction of duty; you may find those comments unfair and that can be your view, l have no problem with it, we will just agree to disagree.