>
>
> Myopic. Nice. and you say I took your comments
> out of context.

Myopic is a fair characterization of Egyptology's exploration of these structures, there is no excuse for missing what Dormion found. Egyptology is a broad discipline, many do not study the pyramids, but specialize in specific areas, and different dynastic timelines, l am not labelling all Egyptology myopic.
>
> Here' the facts..... the concensus view is a
> living organism that grows exponentially while at
> the same time shedding redundant limbs.
>
Some might say....the concensus view is a living virus that grows exponentially while at the same time killing healthy alternative limbs that are not required to support the consensus organism.

>
> When I started posting here two decades ago I was
> just turning 50, just finding time in my life to
> be a student of history again. I thought I was
> pretty informed....
>
>
> HELLO!!! I was an idiot.compared to my current
> understanding of their beliefs, their
> architecture, their infrasturucture, etc....
>
>
> It's a monstrous jigsaw puzzle. the pieces dribble
> in from the most unexpected places. It's not
> gonna get any clearer if we start throwing out any
> pieces.
>
>
> One of my colleagues was a high school Janitor who
> took it upon himself to learn to read the
> language. The more he learned the Less new
> age/anti-concensus, he became.
>
> Why do you think that is? Is it a sign of the
> onset of myopia???

You seem to imply that l am new to this study, l have had an interest and studied ancient Egypt in the last 40 years, and like you, have collected various rare books etc to further my research. It is only now with the suggestion of friends that l put my findings into papers to help others in their own journey of research. If my findings run counter to the consensus of Egyptology, it is for the reader to decide on their own weighing of the evidence. You have mentioned peer review, one such reviewer could be Monnier for example who is an editor; someone contacted me to say he is not happy with my paper on facebook, Monnier says;

"That's not the first time he criticizes my papers. But it was quite respectful until now. 
The big problem is that he doesn't take into account all the existing documentation. So, his conclusions are biased."
>
> Other people d not have to be proven wrong for
> your work to be valuable.

Science works by proving things wrong, otherwise we would still be the centre of the solar system. Egyptology needs to embrace science to prove their consensus/virus
>
> Please keep it up, it IS excellent work
>
Thanks l will, l am much heartened by the worldwide response to my guides.