Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 6, 2024, 7:59 am UTC    
October 19, 2007 06:04PM
I wrote, ‘All that is needed is for the wooden beams to be located at every other hole. smiling smiley

You reply, ‘You don't see the problem with that?’

Nope.


I wrote, ‘If blocks were stored on the floor of the Gallery, then something was needed to keep them in place, and what better than a thick beam of wood fixed across the width of the Gallery from wall to wall and resting on the top of the ramps?’

You reply, ‘No problem at all... except why carve 27 holes on each side when only 13 on each side were needed?’

I would suggest that if these holes were for the purpose Borchardt and others have suggested and we are discussing here, then it is quite possible that the initial plan was for several blocks, not just three, to be stored and later slid down the Ascending Passage, thus requiring more than 13 holes down each side.
Alternatively, the architect might have felt that having holes along the full length of the Gallery was more pleasing to the eye than having them only up to halfway.


You ask, ‘And why, pray tell, put one at the very bottom of the ramps, where it intersects the north wall?’

Why does everything about the Pyramid have to be strictly practical and mundane?
Could it not just be that we are looking at a blending of the practical with the aesthetically/arithmetically/geometrically pleasing?


You ask, ‘And why, pray tell, put one up on the top of the Great Step, just outside the portcullis?’

Ah ha, I know the answer to this one. smiling smiley
Unfortunately, I am not able to say what it is. sad smiley
Suffice to say that like the rest of my hypothesis on the designing of this Pyramid the solution is stunningly simple.
What I can and will tell you now is that it has nothing to do with anything practical.
Here’s a clue: initially, the Great Step was designed as 82.5” wide (E-W), 11.2” deep (N-S), and 5.6” high, and the ramps at the base of the Grand Gallery’s side walls were made 5.6” high vertically.


You write, ‘The idea falls apart on close inspection... which is why I'm puzzled that others who have closely examined the Grand Gallery didn't realize this sooner.’

I think “falls apart” is something of an exaggeration.
To me it’s more “a bit shaky”.

For what it is worth, my own view is essentially that the Grand Gallery and the Ascending Passage together is a stylised portcullis system, and thus was never intended to actually function.

MJ
Subject Author Posted

AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

MJ Thomas October 18, 2007 05:19AM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

Anthony October 18, 2007 06:31AM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

MJ Thomas October 18, 2007 01:27PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

Morph October 18, 2007 03:04PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

RLH October 18, 2007 05:21PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

lobo-hotei October 19, 2007 08:18AM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 09:05AM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

lobo-hotei October 19, 2007 09:32AM

Leverers and lubricants

Anthony October 19, 2007 11:19AM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 02:10PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

RLH October 19, 2007 06:22PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

lobo-hotei October 20, 2007 07:56AM

GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

Anthony October 19, 2007 11:22AM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 03:39PM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

Anthony October 19, 2007 03:48PM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

MJ Thomas October 19, 2007 06:04PM

Missing the point

Anthony October 20, 2007 05:07PM

Re: Missing the point

MJ Thomas October 20, 2007 06:31PM

Re: Missing the point

Anthony October 20, 2007 06:46PM

Re: Missing the point

MJ Thomas October 20, 2007 08:10PM

Re: Missing the point

Anthony October 21, 2007 06:17AM

Re: Missing the point

MJ Thomas October 21, 2007 06:54AM

Re: Missing the point

Anthony October 21, 2007 10:16AM

Re: Missing the point

MJ Thomas October 21, 2007 12:54PM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

lobo-hotei October 20, 2007 08:09AM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

Anthony October 20, 2007 05:05PM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

RLH October 19, 2007 06:27PM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

RLH October 19, 2007 06:39PM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

MJ Thomas October 20, 2007 05:23AM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

Anthony October 20, 2007 06:32AM

Re: GG Ramp slots as retainer apparati

Anthony October 20, 2007 05:09PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

Jammer October 19, 2007 02:18PM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

lobo-hotei October 20, 2007 08:30AM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

MJ Thomas October 20, 2007 06:52AM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

Anthony October 20, 2007 07:32AM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

MJ Thomas October 20, 2007 10:23AM

Re: AP plugs - food for thought II - A revision

Anthony October 21, 2007 06:31AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login