Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 13, 2024, 7:08 pm UTC    
June 18, 2007 11:43AM
MJ
the 77 cubits is measured from the level of the junction of the King Chamber shafts, as shown by Gantenbrink on his site - is this incorrect ?
but what about QC south ? the 121 sloping, 77 vertical seems to give a better fit with Gantenbrink's surveyed angle than Legon's assumed angle
poundr
Subject Author Posted

The KC south shaft and course 104

MJ Thomas June 15, 2007 06:37AM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

C Wayne Taylor June 15, 2007 07:00AM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

MJ Thomas June 15, 2007 05:20PM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

C Wayne Taylor June 15, 2007 06:02PM

Perring and horizontal ends to shafts

Chris Tedder June 16, 2007 01:45PM

Re: Perring and horizontal ends to shafts

MJ Thomas June 16, 2007 06:24PM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

Don Barone June 17, 2007 11:01PM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

MJ Thomas June 18, 2007 03:12AM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

C Wayne Taylor June 18, 2007 05:37AM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

MJ Thomas June 18, 2007 08:18AM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

MJ Thomas June 16, 2007 05:56PM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

C Wayne Taylor June 16, 2007 06:33PM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

MJ Thomas June 17, 2007 05:09PM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

poundr17 June 18, 2007 05:29AM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

MJ Thomas June 18, 2007 07:42AM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

poundr17 June 18, 2007 11:43AM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

MJ Thomas June 18, 2007 01:12PM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

poundr17 June 19, 2007 03:23AM

Re: The KC south shaft and course 104

MJ Thomas June 19, 2007 05:02AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login