You claim a possibility but steadfastly refuse to ascertain, by statistical methods, whether or not the possibility that you claim actually exists. Instead you prefer to post smoke & mirrors, distortions & misrepresentations, straw men & non-sequiturs.

Why? Simplest conclusion is that you know your claim to be deceptive.

Nuff said.

>As for you accusations of lying, you know fine well
>I misquoted a third party document for my evidence,

I know "fine well" that you did not bother to verify it before making a false declarative statement in public. In other words, you did not care whether it was actually true or not, as long as it fitted in wiht your repeated attempts to discredit me. To reasonable people (as embodied in the law of most civilised countries) there is little distinction between a careless disregard for the truth and actually lying.

> and that I corrected myself when I found out that it was factually wrong.

I also know "fine well" that you did not have the common decency to apologise for the several blatant lies you told at my expense (not that I expected it).

Anyway, I'm done with this. Feel free to have the last word; readers can make their own minds up about itsr reliability.

--

Stephen