This is just wrong:

"Conclusion: You know that the possibility of the correlation does not exist"

What you should have written was - you know that there is no strong evidence for a correlation, not that there is no possibility of a correlation.

And, the point was not whether there was any direct differential effect from gravity across an earthquake zone, it was whether the larger tidal movement of huge weights of water at the Zyzygy could encourage earthquakes to happen around these times.

Anyway, if you had asked politely in the first place, I would have told you that I have indeed been following the seismic activity since our last conversation. According to a suggested model relating tides and earthquakes there should be even more activity around the nearest zyzygy to the equinoxes. Unfortunately I thought this was the solstice, which has actually the smallest tides I think, and there was no unusual activity around the summer solstice - so I dropped it.

Now that you have brought it up again, and now that I see its actually the equinoxes and not the solstices, I will keep an eye out towards the end of next month - late September.

Dave L







The Journal of Ancient Egyptian Architecture JAEA:
[egyptian-architecture.com]
[glasgow.academia.edu]
[egyptology-scotland.squarespace.com]
Dave's Archaeology Homepage:
[arkysite.wordpress.com]