Parker, you Wrote:

>I never said there was definitely a correlation,
>just that it was a possibility,

[www.hallofmaat.com]
[www.hallofmaat.com]

> if the total
> gravitational effect is closer to being a sine
> wave than linear, then your original point is
> wrong.

What a classic non-sequitur!

Please stop pretending that my "original point" was anything other than the false claims of a correlation between earthquakes and lunar syzygy.

> So basically, your arguments don't prove or
> disprove anything, from a scientific POV.

OTOH yours are a true demonstration of classic smoke-and-mirrors dissembling of deceptive (pseudo)science. One of the distinctions between science and pseudoscience is (as you have amply demonstrated here) the inability of pseudoscience to correct itself.

>
> PS: Enjoy the footy tonight?

What footy was that? (I'm not a soccer fan; more a cricket & rugger man).

--

Stephen