> yes, i agree with you that life CAN be intelligently designed...but that does not mean
> that it HAS been intelligently designed in the past!
indeed, this seems to be your only "final" argument! Because we can does not mean that it was.
> its like saying, we have designed helicopters today, so the AE's "supposed" drawing of
> a helicopter thousands of years ago means that they had designed helicopters then! it
> does not make sense!
It only does not make sense if you wrongly assume to start with that life evolves in a linear and uniformatistic manner! Meaning that, according to your initial assumption, everything will always have to be more primitive in the past like cave man, etc, etc...
> Or that someone designed us!
of course not, we just randomly evolved from nothing to somehow become intelligent today to be able to design helicopters, atomic bombs and personal stem cells!
> I still believe that we are the way we are due to evoloution/natural selection as
> opposed to being "made"!
I am not here to stop you from believing in whatever you want to believe!
> you only have to look all around us to see evoloution at work to know that, in the main,
> its a sound theory that does not require the need for a "creator"!
First, Darwinian evolution theory has already been falsified. Second, I am not negating evolution per say, I am only putting it within the proper context of the natural laws of the Universe which are based on cycles and not just linear! Meaning that "degeneration" is an integral part of evolution...
Look at any specific "normal" life cycle and you will see that the last part of the cycle is degeneration towards death!
Note also that this degeneration applies also to societies and civilizations. They also all (meaning 100% of them without any exceptions) degenerate and then die.
So, my cyclic theories are a lot more in tune with true reality and all the evidence and facts than what is presently being taught to people...
-wirelessguru1
The Invisible Universe