> This is about frequency, shouldn't that be your thing.
That is a good one. You got me there.
> First of all, we're, or at least I am, not talking about weather.
> Do you understand the difference between climate and weather.
Yes I do know the difference, but climate and weather are still very much related!
IMHO, from reading your posts, you seem to want to emphasize the lack of connectivity between things, when I try to do the exact opposite, which is to look for the potential "connectivity" between things.
> And I'm not the one making suggestions here, you are. I'm simply asking
> if you have evidence to back it up. Should I take all this as a no?
You are correct that I still don't have "published" evidence of how the present Earth EM poles changes are DIRECTLY affecting the climate and weather changes, but this is what I am looking into! Maybe others should also look into this besides just CO2!!!
Again, the FACT still is that electricity and magnetism are directly related to the weather and, therefore, the climate in general. You cannot dispute those FACTS...
eom