> The evidence that the EM poles are ALSO GETTING
> WEAKER as all of these other changes are taking
> place. To me THAT IS FUNDAMENTAL...


Please cite the evidence for this, and the evidence
for how it affects the climate.


> Because the evidence presented so far does not
> pass the straight and forward logic tests! We are
> also seeing that the season changes are getting
> sharper and sharper, in addition to EM pole
> changes and solar cycle changes, so, by no means
> is CO2 the only key factor!!!


IPCC:


Human activities have increased the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols since the pre-industrial era.

...

There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities. Detection and attribution studies consistently find evidence for an anthropogenic signal in the climate record of the las 35 to 50 years. These studies include uncertainties in forcing due to anthropogenic sulfate aerosols and natural factors (volcanoes and solar irradiance), but do not account for the effects of the other types of anthropogenic aerosols and land-use changes. The sulfate and natural forcings are negative over this period and cannot explain the warming; whereas most of the studies find that, over the last 50 years, the estimated rate and magnitude of warming due to increasing greenhouse gases alone are comparable with, or larger than, the observed warming. The best agreement between model simulations and observations over the last 140 years has been found when all the above antropogenic and natural forcing factors are combined, as shown in Figure SPM-2.



> > Did Imorf claim that all seismic activity was
> caused
> > by melting of ice? The Sumatra earthquake has
> nothing
> > to do with what is being discussed here.
>
> No, but he claimed that "increased seismic
> activity" was! IMHO, the recent Sumatra
> earthquake, among a few other big ones recently,
> but not as big as Sumatra, represent the BIGGEST
> increase in recent seismic activity and
> INTENSITY...


IMHO some cats are ugly. Who gives a rats behing about
our opinions?

The earthquakes that have been biggest recently have nothing
to do with what is being discussed here. If you don't understand
that, then I don't know what to say to you.

And I really wouldn't bother if I wasn't concerned about the
lurkers in here, who might be confused with the 'opinions' you
pass here.



Please provide some evidence for your claims, or retract them.
For the sake of the lurkers.