> Yes, but if you want to dispute the views of 1000s of scientists you need some
> convincing alternate piece of evidence not just an endless repetition of
> unsupported assertions.

It is NOT an unsupported assertion to state that I do NOT agree that man is the main cause which is responsible for global warming and the global Earth changes that we are presently experiencing!

> Unless you present evidence, the views of the community of scientists are a much better
> guide to reality.

bernard, no wonder "common reality" or more scientifically speaking the "collective cognitive imperative" never ceases to amaze me...

What is REALLY amazing is that many people do actually believe what you just said!

> Caveat-- of course, the scientists concerned should be ones working in the discipline
> at hand.

Then let's see what "solution" they can find for global warming! I am eagerly waiting...

> He just cited an article providing evidence. Did you read it?

I read it, so what now!!!??? It didn't change my mind...

> Point 1-- post-glacial rebound is an extremely well-known phenomenon. I got 28,000 hits
> on google on the topic. don't you ever google on a topic before spouting off?

Not always! I certainly do not rely on google for everything!!!

To me quantity (number of hits!) does not immediately imply quality and accuracy!!!

Besides, I am most interested in the EM polar shifts than post-glacial rebound and the EM poles have been getting weaker also, besides all these other changes. Maybe the EM poles are also getting weaker due to the extra CO2 and the post-glacial rebound!

> Point 2- the recent tsunami and the effects of post-glacial rebound is an
> apples-to-oranges comparison.

The recent tsunami came from the LARGE Earthquake and we were definitely talking about increased seismic activity...as beeing somehow related to increased CO2 increasing the temperatures and melting the ice!!!