> Yes it will, it will just be too late.

No, it will not!

> It's not MY argument, it's the consensus of thousands of scientists.

Science is NOT a democracy!!! Thousands of scientists don't automatically make something right!

> I am not going to legislate anything, that is not for me to do. The only real
> issue I am posting about is the connection between human related CO2 and
> global warming.

IMHO, if there is a connection, it is most likely only a minor connection...

> Really, should I have to converse with someone that cannot even comprehend a
> simple sentence. Where did I state it would increase pressure on earth's crust?

Here's what you said "the downward pressure they place upon the earth's crust is
released which is going to increase seismic activity itself". So, I guess that I should have said DECREASED from the melting! But, it is still YOUR claim that it is a CHANGE of pressure what is INCREASING seismic activity! Do you have any proof of that!?

> There is no net increase in pressure, there is a redistribution of pressure which
> causes seismic activity.

WOW! Can you prove that!?

> I doubt you will read this, since you come across as someone completely close
> minded and too ignorant to have any real understanding of earth sciences,
> but for the record you can read the following article: "Melting glaciers promote
> earthquakes In southern Alaska, melting glaciers heat up the possibility of
> earthquakes.

..and, of course, you believe that! I wonder what is your explanation for the Sumatra earthquake/tsunami? I don't see ANY ICE MELTING around that area!!!

> That’s according to new research linking ice mass changes caused by glacial
> thinning to an increase in local seismicity and the occurrence of past earthquakes.

Maybe this is the same research group who is also linking CO2 to global warming, now they are linking earthquakes to glacial thinning!!!

Common reality never ceases to amaze me...

eom