> An what additional evidence do you have that the
> experts in this field don't have to draw different
> conclusions?
The evidence that the EM poles are ALSO GETTING WEAKER as all of these other changes are taking place. To me THAT IS FUNDAMENTAL...
> > IMHO, if there is a connection, it is most likely
> > only a minor connection...
>
> Why?
Because the evidence presented so far does not pass the straight and forward logic tests! We are also seeing that the season changes are getting sharper and sharper, in addition to EM pole changes and solar cycle changes, so, by no means is CO2 the only key factor!!!
> Imorf posted you an article. Did you bother to read it?
Yes, so what now!? It didn't change my mind!!!
> Did Imorf claim that all seismic activity was caused
> by melting of ice? The Sumatra earthquake has nothing
> to do with what is being discussed here.
No, but he claimed that "increased seismic activity" was! IMHO, the recent Sumatra earthquake, among a few other big ones recently, but not as big as Sumatra, represent the BIGGEST increase in recent seismic activity and INTENSITY...
Look, it is obvious that imorf wants to desperately believe that the present status of reality is man mad! To me, that is the best definition of common reality or of the collective cognitive imperative...
I am sorry, but I just do not fit in that box!
eom
