<HTML>Mark Grant wrote:
> When I read FOG, I read it more than once and very carefully.
> Unfortunately I don't have my copy at hand, but nowhere at
> any point did Graham Hancock ever say that the pyramids were
> built around 12.5 thousand years ago. He suggested that this
> may be true, and for what appeared to be very good reason. As
> such, Martin Stower's allegation that he did say otherwise is
> wrong, and indicative of illiteracy on his part, or deceit.
As a careful reader, perhaps you could point out to me exactly where I made this allegation?
It's characteristic of Hancock's style and approach to hedge on such points. However, in my experience, most readers get the message.</HTML>