Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 6, 2024, 4:23 pm UTC    
Derek Barnett
August 12, 2001 12:17PM
<HTML>Hi Mark,

If I understand Graham's argument in FOG correctly (sarcasm!) then the Vyse quarry marks had to be seen to be dodgy because they helped date the GP to Khufu's reign. FOG was essentially a search for evidence to support the notion of a lost civilisation which died out circa 10,500BC. I can't help but wonder if the treatment of the quarry marks was typical of the approach GH choose to take towards evidence which would raise awkward questions about his theory.

Regards,

Derek</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

MARTIN STOWER - WHAT FORGERY ? ?

Mark Grant August 12, 2001 10:54AM

Re: MARTIN STOWER - WHAT FORGERY ? ?

Peter Vanderzwet August 12, 2001 11:10AM

Hardass talk vs reality, hypothses vs theory

Mark Grant August 12, 2001 12:06PM

Re: Hardass talk vs reality, hypothses vs theory

Peter Vanderzwet August 12, 2001 12:11PM

Re: Use of Vyse.

Derek Barnett August 12, 2001 12:17PM

MAAT 30; GH 15

Mark Grant August 12, 2001 12:37PM

Re: MAAT 30; GH 15

Katherine Reece August 12, 2001 12:44PM

Re: MAAT 30; GH 30

Mark Grant August 12, 2001 12:50PM

Re: MAAT 30; GH 30

Peter Vanderzwet August 12, 2001 12:54PM

Re: MAAT 40; GH 30

Mark Grant August 12, 2001 01:09PM

Re: MAAT 30; GH 30

Stephen Tonkin August 12, 2001 01:47PM

Re: MAAT 30; GH 30

Dave Moore August 12, 2001 02:48PM

Re: MAAT 40; GH 30

Mark Grant August 12, 2001 01:00PM

Game Ma'at

Mark Grant August 12, 2001 01:24PM

Re: MAAT 40; GH 30

Martin Stower August 12, 2001 04:29PM

Re: MAAT 30; GH 15

D.Przezdziecki August 12, 2001 06:37PM

Tabloids, media, and the bottome line

Mark Grant August 12, 2001 06:51PM

Re: Hardass talk vs reality, hypothses vs theory

Martin Stower August 13, 2001 09:06AM

Sorry Martin! Hardass talk vs reality, hypothses vs theory

Mark Grant August 13, 2001 10:06AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login