<HTML>Like I said on the GHMB, this has nothing to do with when Hancock believes the pyramid was built. It is a completely unrelated subject. This has to do with Hancock's claims that Vyse forged the marks. He has since accepted critisim from Stower and issued a position statement stating same. Since his statement was made however, the work continues to remain present in the main body of his work, thereby misleading new readers.
Credit is due for publishing the letter in revised editions, but readers should not have to search through the fowards, appendix and introduction to find what published material found in the main body of work the author agrees with.</HTML>