<HTML>Ian,
This all sounds like new-age anti-science to me: A common trait in new age thought seems to be the rejection of the scientific/rationalist paradigm on the basis of problems it is percieved to have caused in the world. I think the reasoning employed goes something like this:
"The rise of science as the dominant method by which we make sense of the world over the last 150 years has coincided with the decline in religious observance, and a general decline in 'spiritual' values, and with increased pollution and more powerful weapons of mass destruction"
"Science has given us the means to destroy our world whether this is via the bomb or via our own waste products and pollution"
"We need to find a new direction, moving away from science, and toward a more 'holistic' approach to understanding our lives and surroundings".
I can see the attraction of all of this, but I think people who follow this line of thought are confusing the scientific method with what I might call <i>technological capitalism</i>. What I mean is that science has given the likes of Monsanto the ability to create one-off GM crops to exploit the third world, and has given us the means to build bigger and more deadly weapons, but it is ourselves who have made the choices in how technology is employed. New-agers are happy to benefit from what might be termed the <i>progress</i> made through science (e.g. the internet, freedom from diseases) - they seem to want the benefits of science, without the hard work involved - it's easier to sit and meditate than it is to find something out.
What is needed now, more than ever, is a good public understanding of science, so that democracies can make informed choices on subjects such as genetic engineering, gm, SDI etc etc.
What we absolutely <i>don't</i> need is a rejection of rationalism and a postmodernist/new-age free-for-all, with no way to determine the wheat from the chaff.
Spirituality and science have never been comfortable bedfellows, and I think we're better off with different, but often complimentary approaches to these areas of our lives. Let science explain <i>how</i>, while churches ask <i>why</i>.</HTML>