Ahatmose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Very clever idea to suggest lines of latitude for
> the base of the supporting beams and to call the
> floor 24.1 or creation was quite good as well.
>
> Just nit picking but Petrie has the floor of The
> King's Chamber at 1692.8 inches not 1689.0
>
> And Gary Osborn was convinced it was all about the
> tilt of The Earth, Perhaps he was closer than he
> thought.
>
>
>
> and page 241 and Nomes of 21 each ... and my take
> on The Unification of The Crowns of Upper and
> Lower Egypt
> [
donbarone.altervista.org]
>
> And here is a post of mine on graham's from Dec
> 15th, 2007 and it says the angle in question was
> not 23.5 but 24.09. Gee awfully close to 24.1
> wasn't I ?
> [
grahamhancock.com]
>
> And I have just noticed that the tan of 90 - 24.1
> is almost exactly the square root of 5 .
>
> Just trying to help and it would tie in with all
> the 1' and 2, and sq rt of 5 things we keep
> finding
>
> So may I be bold enough to suggest that the
>
EXACT angle of creation may have
> been 24.094842552110700967071041634711 ??????
> (tan 1/sq rt of 5)
>
> db
Petrie (1883:95) gave the level of the KC wall-base at 1688.5 ±.6". See pgs. 249–50.
For the Origin of Egyptian Crowns –
[
www.academia.edu]
You have used wrong figures for Khufu & Khafre in your Lat. / Lon. check –
I have already compared to Petrie's figures. See pgs. 226–8.
Please note: ALL of my work is COPYRIGHT material. If you post from it, quote from it, or use it in any way, you MUST give the appropriate credit.